Airborne Particulate Concentration During Laser Hair Removal: A Comparison Between Cold Sapphire With Aqueous Gel and Cryogen Skin Cooling

被引:9
作者
Ross, Edward V. [1 ]
Chuang, Gary S. [2 ]
Ortiz, Arisa E. [3 ]
Davenport, Scott A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Clin, Dept Laser & Cosmet Dermatol, 3811 Valley Ctr Dr,Suite 4B, San Diego, CA 92130 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Div Dermatol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Dermatol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Cutera Inc, Brisbane, CA USA
关键词
hair; laser; plume; cooling; DIODE;
D O I
10.1002/lsm.22772
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: High concentrations of sub-micron nanoparticles have been shown to be released during laser hair removal (LHR) procedures. These emissions pose a potential biohazard to healthcare workers that have prolonged exposure to LHR plume. Objective: We sought to demonstrate that cold sapphire skin cooling done in contact mode might suppress plume dispersion during LHR. Methods: A total of 11 patients were recruited for laser hair removal. They were treated on the legs and axilla with a 755 or 1064nm millisecond-domain laser equipped with either (i) cryogen spray (CSC); (ii) refrigerated air (RA); or (iii) contact cooling with sapphire (CC). Concentration of ultrafine nanoparticles < 1mm were measured just before and duringLHRwith the three respective cooling methods. Results: For contact cooling (CC), counts remained at baseline levels, below 3,500 parts per cubic centimeter (ppc) for all treatments. In contrast, the CSC system produced large levels of plume, peaking at times to over 400,000 ppc. The CA cooled system produced intermediate levels of plume, about 35,000 ppc (or about 10 x baseline). Conclusions: Cold Sapphire Skin cooling with gel suppresses plume during laser hair removal, potentially eliminating the need for smoke evacuators, custom ventilation systems, and respirators during LHR. Lasers Surg. Med. 50: 280-283, 2018. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 283
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Alora MBT, 2000, LASER SURG MED, V26, P108, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(2000)26:2<108::AID-LSM2>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-4
[3]   Hypertrichotic Becker's nevi treated with combination 1,550nm non-ablative fractional photothermolysis and laser hair removal [J].
Balaraman, Brundha ;
Friedman, Paul M. .
LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2016, 48 (04) :350-353
[4]  
Baron PA, 2011, AEROSOL MEASUREMENT
[5]   Gaseous and Particulate Content of Laser Hair Removal Plume [J].
Chuang, Gary S. ;
Farinelli, William ;
Christiani, David C. ;
Herrick, Robert F. ;
Lee, Norman C. Y. ;
Avram, Mathew M. .
JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 152 (12) :1320-1326
[6]   A side-by-side comparative study of 1064 nm Nd:YAG, 810 nm diode and 755 nm alexandrite lasers for treatment of 0.3-3 mm leg veins [J].
Eremia, S ;
Li, C ;
Umar, SH .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2002, 28 (03) :224-230
[7]   Theoretical considerations in laser hair removal [J].
Ross, EV ;
Ladin, Z ;
Kreindel, M ;
Dierickx, C .
DERMATOLOGIC CLINICS, 1999, 17 (02) :333-+
[8]  
Ross EV., 1999, DERMATOL CLIN, V17, pviii
[9]   Clinical Assessment of a New 755nm Diode Laser for Hair Removal: Efficacy, Safety, and Practicality in 56 Patients [J].
Royo, Josefina ;
Moreno-Moraga, Javier ;
Trelles, Mario A. .
LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2017, 49 (04) :355-360
[10]  
Zenzie HH, 2000, LASER SURG MED, V26, P130, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(2000)26:2<130::AID-LSM4>3.0.CO