The Slowly Relaxing Local Structure Perspective of Protein Dynamics by NMR Relaxation

被引:2
|
作者
Meirovitch, Eva [1 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Mina & Everard Goodman Fac Life Sci, IL-5290002 Ramat Gan, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
molecular dynamics; NMR relaxation; proteins; stochastic models; time correlation functions; ELECTRON-SPIN-RESONANCE; MODEL-FREE APPROACH; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; ORDER PARAMETERS; LINE-SHAPES; TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENCE; COUPLING ANALYSIS; METHYL ROTATION; SRLS ANALYSIS; DOMAIN;
D O I
10.1002/ijch.201300090
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
NMR relaxation is a powerful method for elucidating structural dynamics. Standard stochastic dynamic models generate time correlation functions (TCFs) that feature physically well-defined parameters. We developed such a model, called the slowly relaxing local structure (SRLS) approach, for proteins. SRLS is a two-body (protein and probe) coupled-rotator approach. Given that the protein (featuring diffusion tensor, D-1) restricts the probe (featuring diffusion tensor, D-2), the two bodies are inherently coupled dynamically. This is substantiated by a local potential, u, associated with a local ordering tensor, S. SRLS allows for general tensorial properties of D-1, D-2, S and the magnetic NMR tensors, and a general form of u. The TCFs are multi-exponential, in accordance with the degree of generality of the various tensors. The traditional model-free (MF) method is based on a different conceptualization. According to it a mode-decoupling bi-exponential (one term for each rotator) TCF captures adequately the detectable features of structural dynamics. Hence, stochastic approaches are unnecessary. Here, we show that this (amply proven) oversimplification leads to physically vague constructs/composites as descriptors of structural dynamics. We illustrate misleading results obtained with MF when mode coupling, or S tensor asymmetry, dominate the analysis. Finally, we delineate the substantial advantage in using SRLS TCF as quantity to be compared with its atomistic molecular dynamicsbased counterpart.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 59
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Local spin dynamics at low temperature in the slowly relaxing molecular chain [Dy(hfac)3{NIT(C6H4OPh)}]: A μ+ spin relaxation study
    Arosio, Paolo
    Corti, Maurizio
    Mariani, Manuel
    Orsini, Francesco
    Bogani, Lapo
    Caneschi, Andrea
    Lago, Jorge
    Lascialfari, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2015, 117 (17)
  • [32] Structure, Dynamics, and Kinetics of Weak Protein-Protein Complexes from NMR Spin Relaxation Measurements of Titrated Solutions
    Salmon, Loiec
    Ortega Roldan, Jose-Luis
    Lescop, Ewen
    Licinio, Antoine
    van Nuland, Nico
    Jensen, Malene Ringkjobing
    Blackledge, Martin
    ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2011, 50 (16) : 3755 - 3759
  • [33] STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF WATER IN TENDON FROM NMR RELAXATION MEASUREMENTS
    PETO, S
    GILLIS, P
    HENRI, VP
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 57 (01) : 71 - 84
  • [34] ION-PAIR STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS BY NMR RELAXATION STUDIES
    WANG, AP
    POCHAPSKY, TC
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1994, 207 : 454 - ORGN
  • [35] CHARACTERIZATION OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS BY NMR CROSS-RELAXATION
    BRUSCHWEILER, R
    CASE, DA
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY, 1994, 26 : 27 - 58
  • [37] NMR methods for the study of protein structure and dynamics
    Kay, LE
    BIOCHEMISTRY AND CELL BIOLOGY, 1997, 75 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [38] Structure and Dynamics of Ribosomal Protein L12: An Ensemble Model Based on SAXS and NMR Relaxation
    Bernado, Pau
    Modig, Kristofer
    Grela, Przemyslaw
    Svergun, Dmitri I.
    Tchorzewski, Marek
    Pons, Miquel
    Akke, Mikael
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 98 (10) : 2374 - 2382
  • [39] Relaxing with liquids and solids - A perspective on biomolecular dynamics
    Schanda, Paul
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2019, 306 : 180 - 186
  • [40] Quantifying protein dynamics in the ps–ns time regime by NMR relaxation
    Griselda Hernández
    David M. LeMaster
    Journal of Biomolecular NMR, 2016, 66 : 163 - 174