共 50 条
High-sensitive Troponin T assay for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: an economic evaluation
被引:22
|作者:
Vaidya, Anil
[1
,2
]
Severens, Johan L.
[3
,4
]
Bongaerts, Brenda W. C.
[5
]
Cleutjens, Kitty B. J. M.
[5
]
Nelemans, Patty J.
[8
]
Hofstra, Leonard
[6
]
van Dieijen-Visser, Marja
[7
]
Biessen, Erik A. L.
[5
]
机构:
[1] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Med Technol Assessment KEMT, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, iMTA Inst Technol Assessment, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht CARIM, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Cardiol Ctr Netherlands, Utrecht, Netherlands
[7] Maastricht Univ, Dept Clin Chem, Maastricht, Netherlands
[8] Maastricht Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源:
BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS
|
2014年
/
14卷
关键词:
Cost-effectiveness;
Decision model;
Acute myocardial infarction;
High-sensitive troponin T;
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION;
COST-EFFECTIVENESS;
EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT;
ASSOCIATION;
STRATEGIES;
MORTALITY;
D O I:
10.1186/1471-2261-14-77
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background: Delayed diagnosis and treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) has a major adverse impact on prognosis in terms of both morbidity and mortality. Since conventional cardiac Troponin assays have a low sensitivity for diagnosing AMI in the first hours after myocardial necrosis, high-sensitive assays have been developed. The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of a high-sensitive Troponin T assay (hsTnT), alone or combined with the heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) assay in comparison with the conventional cardiac Troponin (cTnT) assay for the diagnosis of AMI in patients presenting to the hospital with chest pain. Methods: We performed a cost-utility analysis (quality adjusted life years-QALYs) and a cost effectiveness analysis (life years gained-LYGs) based on a decision analytic model, using a health care perspective in the Dutch context and a life time time-horizon. The robustness of model predictions was explored using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: For a life time incremental cost of 30.70 Euros, use of hsTnT over conventional cTnT results in gain of 0.006 Life Years and 0.004 QALY. It should be noted here that hsTnT is a diagnostic intervention which costs only 4.39 Euros/test more than the cTnT test. The ICER generated with the use of hsTnT based diagnostic strategy comparing with the use of a cTnT-based strategy, is 4945 Euros per LYG and 7370 Euros per QALY. The hsTnT strategy has the highest probability of being cost effective at thresholds between 8000 and 20000 Euros per QALY. The combination of hsTnT and h-FABP strategy's probability of being cost effective remains lower than hsTnT at all willingness to pay thresholds. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that hsTnT assay is a very cost effective diagnostic tool relative to conventional TnT assay. Combination of hsTnT and H-FABP does not offer any additional economic and health benefit over hsTnT test alone.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文