Evaluation and selection of decision-making methods to assess landfill mining projects

被引:13
作者
Hermann, Robert [1 ]
Baumgartner, Rupert J. [2 ]
Vorbach, Stefan [3 ]
Ragossnig, Arne [4 ]
Pomberger, Roland [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leoben, A-8700 Leoben, Austria
[2] Graz Univ, Graz, Austria
[3] Graz Univ Technol, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[4] UTC Umwelttech & GeoConsulting ZT GmbH, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Landfill mining; assessment; multiple-attribute decision making; cost-utility analysis; analytical-hierarchy process; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1177/0734242X15588586
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For the first time in Austria, fundamental technological and economic studies on recovering secondary raw materials from large landfills have been carried out, based on the LAMIS - Landfill Mining Austria' pilot project. A main focus of the research - and the subject of this article - was to develop an assessment or decision-making procedure that allows landfill owners to thoroughly examine the feasibility of a landfill mining project in advance. Currently there are no standard procedures that would sufficiently cover all the multiple-criteria requirements. The basic structure of the multiple attribute decision making process was used to narrow down on selection, conceptual design and assessment of suitable procedures. Along with a breakdown into preliminary and main assessment, the entire foundation required was created, such as definitions of requirements to an assessment method, selection and accurate description of the various assessment criteria and classification of the target system for the present landfill mining' vs. retaining the landfill in after-care' decision-making problem. Based on these studies, cost-utility analysis and the analytical-hierarchy process were selected from the range of multiple attribute decision-making procedures and examined in detail. Overall, both methods have their pros and cons with regard to their use for assessing landfill mining projects. Merging these methods or connecting them with single-criteria decision-making methods (like the net present value method) may turn out to be reasonable and constitute an appropriate assessment method.
引用
收藏
页码:822 / 832
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Methods for multiple attribute decision making, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-93
[2]  
[Anonymous], DEPONIERUCKBAU WIRTS
[3]  
Belton Valerie., 2003, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE
[4]  
Benz A, 1998, METHODS INSTRUMENTS, VXII
[5]  
Bolte S, 2011, SIEDLUNGSABFALLDEPON
[6]  
Gath S., 2010, P DEPOTECHCONFERENCE, P375
[7]  
Geldermann J, 2013, LEITFADEN ANWENDUNG
[8]  
Gotze U, 2008, MODELLE ANAL BEURTEI, V6th
[9]  
Heinisch T, 2010, ENTWICKLUNG ENTSCHEI, VXXII
[10]  
Hermann R., 2014, P 12 DEPOTECH C WAST, P587