Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Medical Imaging Procedures.

被引:1018
作者
Fazel, Reza [1 ]
Krumholz, Harlan M. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Wang, Yongfei [2 ]
Ross, Joseph S. [6 ,7 ]
Chen, Jersey [2 ]
Ting, Henry H. [9 ]
Shah, Nilay D. [10 ]
Nasir, Khurram [11 ,12 ]
Einstein, Andrew J. [8 ]
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K. [13 ,14 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Div Cardiol, Sch Med, Dept Med, Atlanta, GA 30306 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Sect Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, Dept Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Sect Hlth Policy & Adm, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[5] Yale New Haven Med Ctr, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, James J Peters Vet Affairs Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[8] New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY USA
[9] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Rochester, MN USA
[10] Hlth Care Policy & Res, Rochester, MN USA
[11] Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Prevent Cardiol Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
[12] Boston Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Boston, MA USA
[13] Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Hlth Serv Res & Dev Ctr Exc, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[14] Univ Michigan, Div Cardiovasc Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; UNITED-STATES; PATIENT; RISKS; ANGIOGRAPHY; PROTECTION; RADIOLOGY; CANCER; PHYSICIAN; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa0901249
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The growing use of imaging procedures in the United States has raised concerns about exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation in the general population. Methods: We identified 952,420 nonelderly adults (between 18 and 64 years of age) in five health care markets across the United States between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007. Utilization data were used to estimate cumulative effective doses of radiation from imaging procedures and to calculate population-based rates of exposure, with annual effective doses defined as low (lessthan/equal 3 mSv), moderate (>3 to 20 mSv), high (>20 to 50 mSv), or very high (>50 mSv). Results: During the study period, 655,613 enrollees (68.8%) underwent at least one imaging procedure associated with radiation exposure. The mean (+/-SD) cumulative effective dose from imaging procedures was 2.4+/-6.0 mSv per enrollee per year; however, a wide distribution was noted, with a median effective dose of 0.1 mSv per enrollee per year (interquartile range, 0.0 to 1.7). Overall, moderate effective doses of radiation were incurred in 193.8 enrollees per 1000 per year, whereas high and very high doses were incurred in 18.6 and 1.9 enrollees per 1000 per year, respectively. In general, cumulative effective doses of radiation from imaging procedures increased with advancing age and were higher in women than in men. Computed tomographic and nuclear imaging accounted for 75.4% of the cumulative effective dose, with 81.8% of the total administered in outpatient settings. Conclusions: Imaging procedures are an important source of exposure to ionizing radiation in the United States and can result in high cumulative effective doses of radiation. N Engl J Med 2009;361:849-57.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 857
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, NOT GUID CLIN ADM RA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, J RADIOLOGICAL PROTE
  • [3] BEEBE M, 2006, CPT 2007 STANDARD ED
  • [4] Utilization of radiology services in the United States: Levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations
    Bhargavan, M
    Sunshine, JH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (03) : 824 - 832
  • [5] Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced
    Brenner, D. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 81 (967) : 521 - 523
  • [6] Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure
    Brenner, David J.
    Hall, Eric J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) : 2277 - 2284
  • [7] Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know
    Brenner, DJ
    Doll, R
    Goodhead, DT
    Hall, EJ
    Land, CE
    Little, JB
    Lubin, JH
    Preston, DL
    Preston, RJ
    Puskin, JS
    Ron, E
    Sachs, RK
    Samet, JM
    Setlow, RB
    Zaider, M
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (24) : 13761 - 13766
  • [8] Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer
    Brenner, DJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) : 440 - 445
  • [9] Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions
    Buls, N
    Pagés, J
    de Mey, J
    Osteaux, M
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 2003, 85 (02): : 165 - 173
  • [10] Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. Comments on a paper by D J Brenner (Br J Radiol 2008;81:521-3)
    Dietze, G.
    Harrison, J. D.
    Menzeli, H. G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 82 (976) : 348 - 350