Analysis of gene expression using gene sets discriminates cancer patients with and without late radiation toxicity

被引:95
作者
Svensson, J. Peter
Stalpers, Lukas J. A.
Esveldt-van Lange, Rebecca E. E.
Franken, Nicolaas A. P.
Haveman, Jaap
Klein, Binie
Turesson, Ingela
Vrieling, Harry
Giphart-Gassler, Micheline [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Toxicogenet, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Acad Hosp, Dept Oncol Radiol & Clin Immunol, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy, LEXOR, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pmed.0030422
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Radiation is an effective anti-cancer therapy but leads to severe late radiation toxicity in 5%-10% of patients. Assuming that genetic susceptibility impacts this risk, we hypothesized that the cellular response of normal tissue to X-rays could discriminate patients with and without late radiation toxicity. Methods and Findings Prostate carcinoma patients without evidence of cancer 2 y after curative radiotherapy were recruited in the study. Blood samples of 21 patients with severe late complications from radiation and 17 patients without symptoms were collected. Stimulated peripheral lymphocytes were mock-irradiated or irradiated with 2-Gy X-rays. The 24-h radiation response was analyzed by gene expression profiling and used for classification. Classification was performed either on the expression of separate genes or, to augment the classification power, on gene sets consisting of genes grouped together based on function or cellular colocalization. X- ray irradiation altered the expression of radio-responsive genes in both groups. This response was variable across individuals, and the expression of the most significant radio-responsive genes was unlinked to radiation toxicity. The classifier based on the radiation response of separate genes correctly classified 63% of the patients. The classifier based on affected gene sets improved correct classification to 86%, although on the individual level only 21/38 (55%) patients were classified with high certainty. The majority of the discriminative genes and gene sets belonged to the ubiquitin, apoptosis, and stress signaling networks. The apoptotic response appeared more pronounced in patients that did not develop toxicity. In an independent set of 12 patients, the toxicity status of eight was predicted correctly by the gene set classifier. Conclusions Gene expression profiling succeeded to some extent in discriminating groups of patients with and without severe late radiotherapy toxicity. Moreover, the discriminative power was enhanced by assessment of functionally or structurally related gene sets. While prediction of individual response requires improvement, this study is a step forward in predicting susceptibility to late radiation toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:1904 / 1914
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Amundson SA, 2000, RADIAT RES, V154, P342, DOI 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)154[0342:IOPMBI]2.0.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
    Ashburner, M
    Ball, CA
    Blake, JA
    Botstein, D
    Butler, H
    Cherry, JM
    Davis, AP
    Dolinski, K
    Dwight, SS
    Eppig, JT
    Harris, MA
    Hill, DP
    Issel-Tarver, L
    Kasarskis, A
    Lewis, S
    Matese, JC
    Richardson, JE
    Ringwald, M
    Rubin, GM
    Sherlock, G
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2000, 25 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [4] Standardizing global gene expression analysis between laboratories and across platforms
    Bammler, T
    Beyer, RP
    Bhattacharya, S
    Boorman, GA
    Boyles, A
    Bradford, BU
    Bumgarner, RE
    Bushel, PR
    Chaturvedi, K
    Choi, D
    Cunningham, ML
    Dengs, S
    Dressman, HK
    Fannin, RD
    Farun, FM
    Freedman, JH
    Fry, RC
    Harper, A
    Humble, MC
    Hurban, P
    Kavanagh, TJ
    Kaufmann, WK
    Kerr, KF
    Jing, L
    Lapidus, JA
    Lasarev, MR
    Li, J
    Li, YJ
    Lobenhofer, EK
    Lu, X
    Malek, RL
    Milton, S
    Nagalla, SR
    O'Malley, JP
    Palmer, VS
    Pattee, P
    Paules, RS
    Perou, CM
    Phillips, K
    Qin, LX
    Qiu, Y
    Quigley, SD
    Rodland, M
    Rusyn, I
    Samson, LD
    Schwartz, DA
    Shi, Y
    Shin, JL
    Sieber, SO
    Slifer, S
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2005, 2 (05) : 351 - 356
  • [5] Network biology:: Understanding the cell's functional organization
    Barabási, AL
    Oltvai, ZN
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2004, 5 (02) : 101 - U15
  • [6] Barber JBP, 2000, RADIAT RES, V153, P570, DOI 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)153[0570:DOIDIR]2.0.CO
  • [7] 2
  • [8] Towards genetic prediction of radiation responses:: ESTRO's GENEPI project
    Baumann, M
    Hölscher, T
    Begg, AC
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 69 (02) : 121 - 125
  • [9] Begley TJ, 2002, MOL CANCER RES, V1, P103
  • [10] A single nucleotide polymorphism in the MDM2 promoter attenuates the p53 tumor suppressor pathway and accelerates tumor formation in humans
    Bond, GL
    Hu, WW
    Bond, EE
    Robins, H
    Lutzker, SG
    Arva, NC
    Bargonetti, J
    Bartel, F
    Taubert, H
    Wuerl, P
    Onel, K
    Yip, L
    Hwang, SJ
    Strong, LC
    Lozano, G
    Levine, AJ
    [J]. CELL, 2004, 119 (05) : 591 - 602