Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Ling, Tao [1 ]
Zhang, Lianghui [2 ]
Peng, Rui [3 ]
Yue, Chao [3 ]
Huang, Lingli [4 ]
机构
[1] Suqian First Hosp, Dept Pharm, Suqian, Peoples R China
[2] Changzhou Tradit Chinese Med Hosp, Dept Oncol, Changzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Jiangsu Canc Hosp, Jiangsu Inst Canc Res, Canc Hosp,Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Med Univ, Jiangsu Canc Hosp, Jiangsu Inst Canc Res, Canc Hosp,Dept Pharm, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
immune checkpoint inhibitor; non-small-cell lung cancer; prognosis; F-18-FDG PET; CT; metabolic tumor volume; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; PD-L1; EXPRESSION; FDG-PET; 18F-FDG PET/CT; NSCLC PATIENTS; STAGE; PEMBROLIZUMAB; PARAMETERS; DOCETAXEL; IMMUNOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2022.1014063
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Purpose:This study aimed to investigate the value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18-FDG PET/CT) in predicting early immunotherapy response of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods:A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of science, Embase and the Cochrane library was performed to examine the prognostic value of F-18-FDG PET/CT in predicting early immunotherapy response of ICIs in patients with NSCLC. The main outcomes for evaluation were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Detailed data from each study were extracted and analyzed using STATA 14.0 software. Results13 eligible articles were included in this systematic review. Compared to baseline F-18-FDG PET/CT imaging, the pooled hazard ratios (HR) of maximum and mean standardized uptake values SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV and TLG for OS were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.69-1.12), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.50-1.27), 2.10 (95% CI: 1.57-2.82) and 1.58 (95% CI: 1.03-2.44), respectively. The pooled HR of SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV and TLG for PFS were 1.06 (95% CI: 0.68-1.65), 0.66 (95% CI: 0.48-0.90), 1.50 (95% CI: 1.26-1.79), 1.27 (95% CI: 0.92-1.77), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that high MTV group had shorter OS than low MTV group in both first line group (HR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.39-2.79) and undefined line group (HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.61-2.77). High MTV group also showed a shorter PFS in first line group (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.28-2.68), and low TLG group had a longer OS in undefined group (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.00-1.86). No significant differences were in other subgroup analysis. Conclusion:Baseline MTV and TLG may have predictive value and should be prospectively studied in clinical trials. Baseline SUVmax and SUVmean may not be appropriate prognostic markers in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Total lesion glycolysis by 18F-FDG PET/CT is independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Yildirim, Fatma
    Yurdakul, Ahmet Selim
    Ozkaya, Sevket
    Akdemir, Umit Ozguer
    Ozturk, Can
    CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2017, 11 (05): : 602 - 611
  • [32] Predictors of Survival Benefit From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Raphael, Jacques
    Batra, Anupam
    Boldt, Gabriel
    Shah, Prakesh S.
    Blanchette, Phillip
    Rodrigues, George
    Vincent, Mark D.
    CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2020, 21 (02) : 106 - +
  • [33] Physiologic colonic uptake of 18F-FDG on PET/CT is associated with clinical response and gut microbiome composition in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Cvetkovic, Lena
    Regis, Claudine
    Richard, Corentin
    Derosa, Lisa
    Leblond, Antoine
    Malo, Julie
    Messaoudene, Meriem
    Desilets, Antoine
    Belkaid, Wiam
    Elkrief, Arielle
    Routy, Bertrand
    Juneau, Daniel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (05) : 1550 - 1559
  • [34] A systematic review of the prognostic value of texture analysis in 18F-FDG PET in lung cancer
    Sangwon Han
    Sungmin Woo
    Chong Hyun Suh
    Yeon Joo Kim
    Jungsu S. Oh
    Jong Jin Lee
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2018, 32 : 602 - 610
  • [35] Prognostic value of metabolic parameters on baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT in small cell lung cancer
    Araz, Mine
    Soydal, Cigdem
    Ozkan, Elgin
    Sen, Elif
    Nak, Demet
    Kucuk, Ozlem N.
    Gonullu, Ugur
    Kir, K. Metin
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 66 (01): : 61 - 66
  • [36] Prognostic Value of Volumetric Parameters of Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Han, Sangwon
    Kim, Yeon Joo
    Woo, Sungmin
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Lee, Jong Jin
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 43 (12) : 887 - 894
  • [37] Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT for assessment of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Sangwon
    Choi, Joon Young
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (01)
  • [38] Hyperprogressive Disease in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Castello, Angelo
    Rossi, Sabrina
    Mazziotti, Emanuela
    Toschi, Luca
    Lopci, Egesta
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61 (06) : 821 - 826
  • [39] The Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Haowei
    Zhou, Fei
    Qiao, Meng
    Li, Xuefei
    Zhao, Chao
    Cheng, Lei
    Chen, Xiaoxia
    Zhou, Caicun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [40] Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Yu
    Xu, Yanfeng
    Kan, Ying
    Wang, Wei
    Yang, Jigang
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2023, 64 (02) : 552 - 562