An assembly-level neutronic calculation method based on LightGBM algorithm

被引:29
作者
Cai, Jiejin [1 ]
Li, Xuezhong [1 ]
Tan, Zhixiong [1 ]
Peng, Sitao [2 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Elect Power, 381 Wushan Rd, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] China Nucl Power Technol Res Inst, Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Neutronic calculation; Assembly-level; LightGBM algorithm; FUEL-MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION; CORE; REACTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107871
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
In this paper, a novel assembly-level neutronic calculation method based on a machine learning technique, the LightGBM algorithm, has been proposed. The calculating model based on LightGBM algorithm is established to calculate the assembly-level neutronic parameters, including Infinite Multiplication Factor 'Kinf', Power Peak Factor 'PPF', and Burnup 'B', which are normally calculated by exactly solving the neutron transport equations. The proposed method was first applied to assemblies cases of different sizes varying from 3 x 3, 5 x 5, 7 x 7, 9 x 9, 14 x 14 and 17 x 17 to calculate Kinf, and compared with other five Machine Learning algorithms. The results show that the proposed method based on LightGBM Algorithm has the most stable and decent performance in forecasting Infinite Multiplication Factor 'Kiln'. Therefore, LightGBM was directly implemented to calculate other neutronic calculations for a 17 x 17 assembly. The overall precision is also satisfactory. The main distribution range of errors of Kinf is [ -0.003, +0.0084], of PPF is [-0.0009, +0.0153] and of Burnup (MWD/KgU) is [ -0.0628, +0.2552]. Overall, the new proposed method will be promising in some certain application scenarios especially during the Loading Pattern (LP) optimization. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] PWR system simulation and parameter estimation with neural networks
    Akkurt, H
    Çolak, Ü
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2002, 29 (17) : 2087 - 2103
  • [2] New genetic algorithms (GA) to optimize PWR reactors - Part III: The Haling power depletion method for in-core fuel management analysis
    Alim, Fatih
    Ivanov, Kostadin
    Levine, Samuel H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2008, 35 (01) : 121 - 131
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, BEST 1 DECISION TREE
  • [4] Compressed Sensing Artificial Neural Network for Reactor Core Flux Mapping
    Bahuguna, S. K.
    Mukhopadhyay, S.
    Tiwari, A. P.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2018, 65 (08) : 2240 - 2249
  • [5] Cai J., 2012, APPL SUPPORT VECTOR
  • [6] Ke G., 2017, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst
  • [7] PWR fuel management optimization using continuous particle swarm intelligence
    Khoshahval, F.
    Zolfaghari, A.
    Minuchehr, H.
    Sadighi, M.
    Norouzi, A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2010, 37 (10) : 1263 - 1271
  • [8] IN-CORE NUCLEAR-FUEL MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION FOR PRESSURIZED WATER-REACTORS UTILIZING SIMULATED ANNEALING
    KROPACZEK, DJ
    TURINSKY, PJ
    [J]. NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 95 (01) : 9 - 32
  • [9] Li Ping, 2007, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR, V20
  • [10] Marleau G., 2016, USER GUIDE DRAGON