Blinded sample size recalculation in clinical trials with binary composite endpoints

被引:6
|
作者
Sander, Anja [1 ]
Rauch, Geraldine [1 ]
Kieser, Meinhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometry & Informat, Neuenheimer Feld 130-3, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Clinical trials; composite endpoints; internal pilot study design; multiple testing; sample size recalculation; PILOT-STUDY DESIGNS; PACLITAXEL-ELUTING STENT; REESTIMATION; ADJUSTMENT;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2016.1198371
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
We consider clinical trials with a binary composite endpoint where the trial is successful when a significant result is achieved for the composite or one prespecified main component. Appropriate sample size planning is challenging in this situation, as in addition to the Type I error rate, power, and target difference the overall event rates and the correlation between the test statistics have to be defined. Reliable estimates of these quantities, however, are usually hard to obtain and therefore there is a high risk to not achieve the intended power in a fixed sample size design. In this article, we propose an internal pilot study design where the nuisance parameters are estimated in a blinded way at an interim stage and where the sample size is then revised accordingly. We investigate the characteristics of the proposed design with respect to the actual Type I error rate, power, and sample size. The application of this design is illustrated by a clinical trial example.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 715
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sample size recalculation based on the prevalence in a randomized test-treatment study
    Hot, Amra
    Benda, Norbert
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Gerke, Oke
    Vach, Werner
    Zapf, Antonia
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [32] Sample size determination in group-sequential clinical trials with two co-primary endpoints
    Asakura, Koko
    Hamasaki, Toshimitsu
    Sugimoto, Tomoyuki
    Hayashi, Kenichi
    Evans, Scott R.
    Sozu, Takashi
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (17) : 2897 - 2913
  • [33] Are component endpoints equal? A preference study into the practice of composite endpoints in clinical trials
    Vaanholt, Melissa C. W.
    Kok, Marlies M.
    von Birgelen, Clemens
    Weernink, Marieke G. M.
    van Til, Janine A.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2018, 21 (06) : 1046 - 1055
  • [34] Blinded sample size re-estimation in superiority and noninferiority trials: bias versus variance in variance estimation
    Friede, Tim
    Kieser, Meinhard
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2013, 12 (03) : 141 - 146
  • [35] Power and Sample Size Calculations for the Restricted Mean Time Analysis of Prioritized Composite Endpoints
    Mao, Lu
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 15 (03): : 540 - 548
  • [36] Sample size determination and re-estimation for matched pair designs with multiple binary endpoints
    Xu, Jin
    Yu, Menggang
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 55 (03) : 430 - 443
  • [37] Sample size recalculation in internal pilot study designs: A review
    Friede, Tim
    Kieser, Meinhard
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 48 (04) : 537 - 555
  • [38] The win ratio: a new approach to the analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials based on clinical priorities
    Pocock, Stuart J.
    Ariti, Cono A.
    Collier, Timothy J.
    Wang, Duolao
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (02) : 176 - 182
  • [39] Sample Size Calculation for Clinical Trials of Medical Decision Support Systems with Binary Outcome
    Rebrova, O. Yu.
    Gusev, A. V.
    SOVREMENNYE TEHNOLOGII V MEDICINE, 2022, 14 (03) : 6 - 13
  • [40] Estimating and testing treatment effects on two binary endpoints and association between endpoints in clinical trials
    Wang, WQ
    Woolson, RF
    Clarke, WR
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2005, 34 (03) : 751 - 769