The Influence of Fat Grafting on Breast Imaging after Postmastectomy Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Cason, Roger W.
Shammas, Ronnie L.
Broadwater, Gloria
Glener, Adam D.
Sergesketter, Amanda R.
Vernon, Rebecca
Le, Elliot
Wickenheisser, Victoria A.
Marks, Caitlin E.
Orr, Jonah
Pyfer, Bryan J.
Hollenbeck, Scott T.
机构
[1] Duke Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Div Plast Maxillofacial & Oral Surg, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Canc Inst, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC USA
关键词
AUTOLOGOUS FAT; CANCER; SAFETY; COMPLICATIONS; VOLUME; RATES;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000007327
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Fat grafting to the reconstructed breast may result in the development of benign lesions on physical examination, prompting further investigation with imaging and biopsy. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of fat grafting on the incidence of imaging and biopsies after postmastectomy reconstruction. Methods: Patients who underwent autologous or implant-based reconstruction following mastectomy from 2010 to 2018 were identified. Those receiving fat grafting as part of their reconstructive course were propensity matched 1:1 to those that did not with body mass index, reconstruction timing, and reconstruction type as covariates in a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: A total of 186 patients were identified, yielding 93 propensity-matched pairs. Fat-grafted patients had higher incidences of palpable masses (38.0 percent versus 18.3 percent; p = 0.003) and postreconstruction imaging (47.3 percent versus 29.0 percent; p = 0.01), but no significant difference in the number of biopsies performed (11.8 percent versus 7.5 percent; p = 0.32). Imaging was predominately interpreted as normal (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 1, 27.9 percent) or benign (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 2, 48.8 percent), with fat necrosis being the most common finding [n = 20 (45.5 percent)]. No demographic, oncologic, reconstructive, or fat grafting-specific variables were predictive of receiving postreconstruction imaging on multivariate analysis. Fat grafting was not associated with decreased 5-year overall survival or locoregional recurrence-free survival. Conclusions: Fat grafting to the reconstructed breast is associated with increased incidences of palpable masses and subsequent postreconstruction imaging with benign radiographic findings. Although the procedure is oncologically safe, both patients and providers should be aware that concerning physical examination findings can be benign sequelae of fat grafting and may lead to increased imaging after breast reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:1227 / 1236
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Oncologic Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
    Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M.
    Hollenbeck, Scott T.
    Greenup, Rachel A.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (12) : 1150 - 1151
  • [42] A systematic review of factors affecting quality of life after postmastectomy breast reconstruction in women with breast cancer
    Sousa, Helena
    Castro, Sonia
    Abreu, Joaquim
    Graca Pereira, M.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 (11) : 2107 - 2118
  • [43] Optimal Strategies for Autologous Fat Grafting in Breast Augmentation and Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Sun, Yulin
    Liu, Qian
    Zhu, Jie
    Hu, Hao
    Lu, Lu
    Ying, Jianghui
    Guo, Rong
    Ye, Xiuyu
    Zhu, Lie
    Jiang, Hua
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2025, 155 (02) : 243e - 255e
  • [44] A Comparative Analysis of Immediate and Delayed-immediate Breast Reconstruction after Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy
    Christopher, Adrienne N.
    Morris, Martin P.
    Broach, Robyn B.
    Serletti, Joseph M.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2022, 38 (06) : 499 - 505
  • [45] Endoscopic mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction with fat grafting for breast cancer
    Narui, Kazutaka
    Satake, Toshihiko
    Ishikawa, Takashi
    Muto, Mayu
    Tsunoda, Yui
    Yamada, Akimitsu
    Kawashima, Kei
    Uenaka, Natsuki
    Fujiwara, Yoshie
    Oshi, Masanori
    Adachi, Shoko
    Suzuki, Chiho
    Wada, Tomoko
    Yamamoto, Shinya
    Tanabe, Mikiko
    Maegawa, Jiro
    Endo, Itaru
    BREAST CANCER, 2024, 31 (03) : 476 - 484
  • [46] Clinical outcomes of postmastectomy radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction
    Jhaveri, Jigna Desai
    Rush, Stephen C.
    Kostroff, Karen
    Derisi, Dwight
    Farber, Leonard A.
    Maurer, Virginia F.
    Bosworth, Jay L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (03): : 859 - 865
  • [47] Postoperative Complication Impact on Quality of Life after Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
    Zhang, Chi
    Gomez, Diego
    Abdulwadood, Isra
    Kosiorek, Heidi
    Hammond, Jacob B.
    Cronin, Patricia
    Reece, Edward
    Rebecca, Alanna
    Casey, William
    Pockaj, Barbara A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (02) : 319 - 330
  • [48] Efficacy of an external volume expansion device and autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction following breast conserving surgery and total mastectomy: Small improvements in quality of life found in a prospective cohort study
    Howes, Benjamin H. L.
    Watson, David I.
    Fosh, Beverley
    Dean, Nicola R.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2020, 73 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [49] Review of Quantitative Imaging for Objective Assessment of Fat Grafting Outcomes in Breast Surgery
    Sampathkumar, Urmila
    Nowroozilarki, Zhale
    Bordes, Mary Catherine
    Reece, Gregory P.
    Hanson, Summer E.
    Markey, Mia K.
    Merchant, Fatima A.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2021, 41 : S39 - S49
  • [50] Oncologic safety of immediate autologous fat grafting for reconstruction in breast-conserving surgery
    Stumpf, Camile Cesa
    Zucatto, Angela Erguy
    Crespo Cavalheiro, Jose Antonio
    de Melo, Marcia Portela
    Cericato, Rodrigo
    Souto Damin, Andrea Pires
    Biazus, Jorge Villanova
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 180 (02) : 301 - 309