Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)

被引:18
作者
Tuliao, Patrick H.
Koo, Kyo C.
Komninos, Christos
Chang, Chien H.
Choi, Young D.
Chung, Byung H.
Hong, Sung J.
Rha, Koon H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Urol Sci Inst, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; surgical margins; CANCER; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; SIZE; WEIGHT; EXPERIENCE; OBESITY; VOLUME; GRADE; GLAND;
D O I
10.1111/bju.12888
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the impact of prostate size on positive surgical margin (PSM) rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and the preoperative factors associated with PSM. Patients and Methods In all, 1229 men underwent RARP by a single surgeon, from 2005 to August of 2013. Excluded were patients who had transurethral resection of the prostate, neoadjuvant therapy, clinically advanced cancer, and the first 200 performed cases (to reduce the effect of learning curve). Included were 815 patients who were then divided into three prostate size groups: <31 g (group 1), 31-45 g (group 2), >45 g (group 3). Multivariate analysis determined predictors of PSM and biochemical recurrence (BCR). Results Console time and blood loss increased with increasing prostate size. There were more high-grade tumours in group 1 (group 1 vs group 2 and group 3, 33.9% vs 25.1% and 25.6%, P = 0.003 and P = 0.005). PSM rates were higher in prostates of <45 g with preoperative PSA levels of >20 ng/dL, Gleason score >= 7, T3 tumour, and >= 3 positive biopsy cores. In group 1, preoperative stage T3 [odds ratio (OR) 3.94, P = 0.020] and >= 3 positive biopsy cores (OR 2.52, P = 0.043) were predictive of PSM, while a PSA level of >20 ng/dL predicted the occurrence of BCR (OR 5.34, P = 0.021). No preoperative factors predicted PSM or BCR for groups 2 and 3. Conclusion A preoperative biopsy with >= 3 positive cores in men with small prostates predicts PSM after RARP. In small prostates with PSM, a PSA level of >20 ng/dL is a predictor of BCR. These factors should guide the choice of therapy and indicate the need for closer postoperative follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 904
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Modified Ultradissection Reduces pT2 Positive Surgical Margins on the Bladder Neck
    Araki, Motoo
    Jeong, Wooju
    Park, Sung Yul
    Lee, Young Hoon
    Nasu, Yasutomo
    Kumon, Hiromi
    Hong, Sung Joon
    Rha, Koon Ho
    ACTA MEDICA OKAYAMA, 2014, 68 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [22] Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: The influence of site and number on progression
    Sofer, M
    Hamilton-Nelson, KL
    Civantos, F
    Soloway, AS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (06) : 2453 - 2456
  • [23] Tumour location determined by preoperative MRI is an independent predictor for positive surgical margin status after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Li, Youjian
    Fu, Yao
    Li, Weijian
    Xu, Linfeng
    Zhang, Qing
    Gao, Jie
    Li, Danyan
    Li, Xiaogong
    Qiu, Xuefeng
    Guo, Hongqian
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (01) : 152 - 158
  • [24] Quality of Preoperative Biopsy Is a Risk Factor for Positive Surgical Margins in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Treated with Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Buetow, Zentia
    Schunk, Stefan
    Janssen, Martin
    Graeber, Stefan
    Saar, Matthias
    Kamradt, Joern
    Siemer, Stefan
    Stoeckle, Michael
    Ohlmann, Carsten-Henning
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 95 (04) : 465 - 471
  • [25] Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Ha, Yun-Sok
    Kang, Dong Il
    Kim, Jeong Hyun
    Joung, Jae Young
    Yu, Jihyeong
    Parihar, Jaspreet S.
    Salmasi, Amirali Hassanzadeh
    Hone, Shigeo
    Kim, Wun-Jae
    Kim, Isaac Yi
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 (03) : 7290 - 7297
  • [26] Positive surgical margin in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: correlation with pathology findings and risk of biochemical recurrence
    Jo, Jung-Ki
    Hong, Sung-Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Zargar, Homayoun
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Lee, Sang-Eun
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2017, 69 (05) : 493 - 500
  • [27] Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
    Somford, Diederik M.
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Cosyns, Jean-Pierre
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M.
    Tombal, Bertrand
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (01) : 105 - 110
  • [28] Apical Surgical Margins Status in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Does Not Depend on Disease Characteristics
    Tsivian, Matvey
    Zilberman, Dorit E.
    Ferrandino, Michael N.
    Madden, John F.
    Mouraviev, Vladimir
    Albala, David M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (04) : 361 - 365
  • [29] Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Gautier Marcq
    Aude Michelet
    Gerjon Hannink
    Jerome Rizk
    Jean Sauvain
    Arnauld Villers
    Mo Saffarini
    Charles H. Rochat
    BMC Cancer, 18
  • [30] Predictors of positive surgical margins at open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon series
    Weerakoon M.
    Sengupta S.
    Sethi K.
    Ischia J.
    Webb D.R.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2012, 6 (4) : 311 - 316