Long-term restenosis rate of eversion endarterectomy on the internal carotid artery

被引:22
作者
Szabo, A [1 ]
Brazda, E [1 ]
Dosa, E [1 ]
Apor, A [1 ]
Szabolcs, Z [1 ]
Entz, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Semmelweis Univ, Fac Med, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
eversion endarterectomy; internal carotid artery; recurrent stenosis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.02.017
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. The eversion endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery was introduced in Hungary in 1991. The aim of this study was to define the long-term restenosis rate of this procedure. Patients and Methods. Between 1991 and 1993, 171 operations, on 151 patients, were performed by single surgeon: with long-term follow up of 109 patients, which included annual physical and ultrasound examinations. Restenosis rate and plaque morphology were defined. Survival and patency rate were analysed by life-tables. Results. The combined perioperative stroke morbidity and mortality rate was 0.8%. The 5-year patient survival rate was 85%, the recurrent stenosis free rate was 88% at 5 years. Only 9% of the patients had carotid restenosis of more than 70% during this period. Ultrasound plaque morphology showed calcification in one case. Two patients had re-operations, with plaque histology showed myointimal hyperplasia in each case. Conclusions. Our results for restenosis are compare favourably with the 2-34% restenosis rate reported in the literature. Ultrasound and histological findings suggest that atherosclerosis does not play a significant role in the development of restenosis after the eversion carotid endarterectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 539
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Angioplasty and stenting of the cervical carotid bifurcation: report of a 4-year series [J].
Bonaldi, G .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 2002, 44 (02) :164-174
[2]   Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: Late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial [J].
Cao, P ;
Giordano, G ;
De Rango, P ;
Zannetti, S ;
Chiesa, R ;
Coppi, G ;
Palombo, D ;
Peinetti, F ;
Spartera, C ;
Stancanelli, V ;
Vecchiati, E .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 31 (01) :19-28
[3]   A randomized study on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: Study design and preliminary results: The Everest Trial [J].
Cao, P ;
Giordano, G ;
De Rango, P ;
Zannetti, S ;
Chiesa, R ;
Coppi, G ;
Palombo, D ;
Spartera, C ;
Stancanelli, V ;
Vecchiati, E .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 27 (04) :595-605
[4]   Eversion vs conventional carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review [J].
Cao, P ;
De Rango, P ;
Zannetti, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 23 (03) :195-201
[5]  
Entz L, 1996, Cardiovasc Surg, V4, P190, DOI 10.1016/0967-2109(96)82313-1
[6]  
ENTZ L, 1995, HUNG J SURG, V48, P137
[7]  
KASPRZAK PM, 1989, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V30, P495
[8]   Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy: Comparison with primary closure and carotid patch angioplasty [J].
Katras, T ;
Baltazar, U ;
Rush, DS ;
Sutterfield, WC ;
Harvill, LM ;
Stanton, PE .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 34 (03) :453-458
[9]   Single center experience on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: a prospective non-randomized study [J].
Radak, D ;
Radevic, B ;
Sternic, N ;
Vucurevic, G ;
Petrovic, B ;
Ilijevski, N ;
Radicevic, S ;
Neskovic, AN ;
Bojic, M .
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 8 (06) :422-+
[10]   Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique - Its safety and durability [J].
Shah, DM ;
Darling, RC ;
Chang, BB ;
Paty, PSK ;
Kreienberg, PB ;
Lloyd, WE ;
Leather, RP .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 228 (04) :471-476