Long-term restenosis rate of eversion endarterectomy on the internal carotid artery

被引:22
作者
Szabo, A [1 ]
Brazda, E [1 ]
Dosa, E [1 ]
Apor, A [1 ]
Szabolcs, Z [1 ]
Entz, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Semmelweis Univ, Fac Med, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
eversion endarterectomy; internal carotid artery; recurrent stenosis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.02.017
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. The eversion endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery was introduced in Hungary in 1991. The aim of this study was to define the long-term restenosis rate of this procedure. Patients and Methods. Between 1991 and 1993, 171 operations, on 151 patients, were performed by single surgeon: with long-term follow up of 109 patients, which included annual physical and ultrasound examinations. Restenosis rate and plaque morphology were defined. Survival and patency rate were analysed by life-tables. Results. The combined perioperative stroke morbidity and mortality rate was 0.8%. The 5-year patient survival rate was 85%, the recurrent stenosis free rate was 88% at 5 years. Only 9% of the patients had carotid restenosis of more than 70% during this period. Ultrasound plaque morphology showed calcification in one case. Two patients had re-operations, with plaque histology showed myointimal hyperplasia in each case. Conclusions. Our results for restenosis are compare favourably with the 2-34% restenosis rate reported in the literature. Ultrasound and histological findings suggest that atherosclerosis does not play a significant role in the development of restenosis after the eversion carotid endarterectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 539
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Angioplasty and stenting of the cervical carotid bifurcation: report of a 4-year series
    Bonaldi, G
    [J]. NEURORADIOLOGY, 2002, 44 (02) : 164 - 174
  • [2] Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: Late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial
    Cao, P
    Giordano, G
    De Rango, P
    Zannetti, S
    Chiesa, R
    Coppi, G
    Palombo, D
    Peinetti, F
    Spartera, C
    Stancanelli, V
    Vecchiati, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 31 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [3] A randomized study on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: Study design and preliminary results: The Everest Trial
    Cao, P
    Giordano, G
    De Rango, P
    Zannetti, S
    Chiesa, R
    Coppi, G
    Palombo, D
    Spartera, C
    Stancanelli, V
    Vecchiati, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 27 (04) : 595 - 605
  • [4] Eversion vs conventional carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review
    Cao, P
    De Rango, P
    Zannetti, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 23 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [5] Entz L, 1996, Cardiovasc Surg, V4, P190, DOI 10.1016/0967-2109(96)82313-1
  • [6] ENTZ L, 1995, HUNG J SURG, V48, P137
  • [7] KASPRZAK PM, 1989, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V30, P495
  • [8] Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy: Comparison with primary closure and carotid patch angioplasty
    Katras, T
    Baltazar, U
    Rush, DS
    Sutterfield, WC
    Harvill, LM
    Stanton, PE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 34 (03) : 453 - 458
  • [9] Single center experience on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: a prospective non-randomized study
    Radak, D
    Radevic, B
    Sternic, N
    Vucurevic, G
    Petrovic, B
    Ilijevski, N
    Radicevic, S
    Neskovic, AN
    Bojic, M
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 8 (06): : 422 - +
  • [10] Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique - Its safety and durability
    Shah, DM
    Darling, RC
    Chang, BB
    Paty, PSK
    Kreienberg, PB
    Lloyd, WE
    Leather, RP
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 228 (04) : 471 - 476