Controlled traffic farming restores soil structure

被引:80
作者
McHugh, A. D. [1 ]
Tullberg, J. N. [1 ]
Freebairn, D. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia
[2] Queensland Dept Nat Resources & Water, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
关键词
Vertosol; Amelioration; Bulk density; Available water capacity; Compaction; Controlled traffic; permanent beds; zero tillage; and macropore density; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; COMPACTION; VERTISOL; POROSITY; CYCLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.still.2008.10.010
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil structural degradation is widespread in cropping lands and efforts to restore deteriorated soil structure very often fail, largely as a result of unchanged tillage and traffic practises. Significant reductions in biological activity in the soil environment occur where random traffic is practiced, limiting the regenerative capacity of soils. This study assessed the changes in soil structure after random field wheeling was replaced with controlled traffic through four cropping seasons. The rate and depth of soil amelioration by natural processes was assessed by changes in, soil water retention characteristics, macroporosity and bulk density. Soil moisture characteristics indicated that the available water capacity (AWC) was 10.2 mm per 100 mm depth of soil before restoration. Amelioration of the soil matrix increased AWC to 15.4 mm per 100 mm depth of soil. Macropore density improved from very marginal conditions by 50% at 100 mm and 27% at 300 mm depths. Bulk density prior to restoration was similar to 1.40 g cm(-3), which was typical for a degraded vertosol, however values improved significantly to 1.25 g cm(-3) at 100 mm depths, with deeper zones improving to 1.30 g cm(-3). Zero till, controlled traffic, permanent bed farming offers opportunities for restoration of physically degraded vertosols and therefore, for improving the productivity and sustainability of mechanised farming. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 172
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]  
COOK GD, 1988, THESIS U QUEENSLAND
[12]   THE MEASUREMENT OF SOIL STRUCTURE - SOME PRACTICAL INITIATIVES [J].
COUGHLAN, KJ ;
MCGARRY, D ;
LOCH, RJ ;
BRIDGE, B ;
SMITH, GD .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1991, 29 (06) :869-889
[13]   SUBSOIL AMELIORATION BY PLANT-ROOTS - THE PROCESS AND THE EVIDENCE [J].
CRESSWELL, HP ;
KIRKEGAARD, JA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1995, 33 (02) :221-239
[14]   USE AND ACCURACY OF THE FILTER-PAPER TECHNIQUE FOR MEASUREMENT OF SOIL MATRIC POTENTIAL [J].
DEKA, RN ;
WAIRIU, M ;
MTAKWA, PW ;
MULLINS, CE ;
VEENENDAAL, EM ;
TOWNEND, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1995, 46 (02) :233-238
[15]  
GARDNER EA, 1988, UNDERSTANDING SOILS, P153
[16]  
Gibbs R. J., 1988, Advances in Soil Science, V8, P123
[17]  
GOSS MJ, 1987, SOIL COMPACTION REGE
[18]  
Greacen E. L., 1989, 108 CSIRO DIV SOILS
[19]   THE INFLUENCE OF SOIL STRUCTURE ON WATER-MOVEMENT, CROP ROOT-GROWTH, AND WATER-UPTAKE [J].
HAMBLIN, AP .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, 1985, 38 :95-158
[20]   FILTER-PAPER METHOD FOR ROUTINE MEASUREMENT OF FIELD WATER POTENTIAL [J].
HAMBLIN, AP .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1981, 53 (3-4) :355-360