Determining the role of eudaimonic values in conservation behavior

被引:22
作者
Winkler-Schor, Sophia [1 ,2 ]
van Riper, Carena J. [1 ]
Landon, Adam [3 ]
Keller, Rose [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, 1102 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Georg August Univ, Wilhelm Weber Str 2, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[3] Minnesota Dept Nat Resources, 500 Lafayette Rd, St Paul, MN 55155 USA
[4] Natl Pk Serv, Denali Natl Pk & Preserve, POB 9, Denali Natl Pk, AK 99755 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
behavior change; conservation social science; protected areas; psychology; values; á reas protegidas; cambios en el comportamiento; ciencias sociales de la conservació n; psicologí a; valores; 保 护 社 会 科 学 心 理 价 值 行 为 改 变 区 PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; SOCIAL VALUES; NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; BIOSPHERIC VALUE; WELL; PEOPLE; NUMBER; PREFERENCES; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13622
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Values are the fundamental reasons why people engage in conservation behaviors. Recent research has called for a more refined approach to studying values in a way that accounts for the concept of eudaimonia. However, the empirical properties for a eudaimonic value scale have not been tested given that previous investigations have remained at the theoretical level. Drawing from an on-site survey of visitors to Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska, we used a latent profile analysis used a latent profile analysis to better understand the expression of multiple values of nature. Specifically, we segmented respondents by their value orientations with a particular focus on evaluating eudaimonic and hedonic values, alongside the established dimensions of altruistic, biospheric, and egoistic values. We identified 4 distinct subgroups defined by value orientations and validated these subgroups based on measures of conservation behavior and sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age). These results indicated campaign messaging should harness a combination of eudaimonic, biospheric, and altruistic values to propel individual behavior. We also observed that hedonic and egoistic values defined how people related to nature and played a role, albeit less pronounced, in motivating them to take action. Our study is one of the first efforts to operationalize eudaimonia in a conservation context; thus, we have opened a new avenue for protected-area managers to align their strategies with the underlying values of stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:1404 / 1415
页数:12
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation [J].
Ajzen, I ;
Brown, TC ;
Carvajal, F .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (09) :1108-1121
[2]  
Allport G.W., 1960, STUDY VALUES SCALE M, V3rd
[3]   Beyond the roots of human inaction: Fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation [J].
Amel, Elise ;
Manning, Christie ;
Scott, Britain ;
Koger, Susan .
SCIENCE, 2017, 356 (6335) :275-278
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, US GUID
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, VIRTUE PYCHOLOGY PUR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CITIES ENV CATE
[7]   Visitors' memories of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences [J].
Ballantyne, Roy ;
Packer, Jan ;
Sutherland, Lucy A. .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2011, 32 (04) :770-779
[8]   An evaluation of respondent selection methods for household mail surveys [J].
Battaglia, Michael P. ;
Link, Michael W. ;
Frankel, Martin R. ;
Osborn, Larry ;
Mokdad, Ali H. .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2008, 72 (03) :459-469
[9]   Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation [J].
Bennett, Nathan J. ;
Roth, Robin ;
Klain, Sarah C. ;
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Clark, Douglas A. ;
Cullman, Georgina ;
Epstein, Graham ;
Nelson, Michael Paul ;
Stedman, Richard ;
Teel, Tara L. ;
Thomas, Rebecca E. W. ;
Wyborn, Carina ;
Curran, Deborah ;
Greenberg, Alison ;
Sandlos, John ;
Verissimo, Diogo .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2017, 31 (01) :56-66
[10]   Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, 2nd edition [J].
Kelava, Augustin .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2016, 41 (04) :443-447