Canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions: 13-year clinical experience at a tertiary care center

被引:2
作者
Yakar, Derya [1 ]
Kwee, Thomas C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiol Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Hanzepl 1,POB 30-001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Biopsy; Cytology; Drainage; Interventional radiology; Multidetector computed tomography; RADIATION-EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-018-5991-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo determine the frequency and causes of canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions (biopsies, cytological aspirations, hookwire localizations, and catheter drainages), associations with patient and procedural variables, and subsequent management.MethodsThis study included 3052 consecutive CT-guided interventions (2487 biopsies, 80 cytological aspirations, 223 hookwire localizations, and 262 catheter drainages) performed in a single institution within a 13-year period.ResultsFifty-two of 3052 CT-guided interventions were canceled or aborted, corresponding to a frequency of 1.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.2%). Main causes in order of decreasing frequency included pain, lack of a safe window for intervention, impossibility to position the co-axial or biopsy needle in or near the target, inability to lie still, dyspnea and low oxygen saturation levels, non-discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy, impossibility to aspirate fluid or pus when attempting drainage, and impossibility to advance the drainage catheter in a fluid collection or abscess. On multivariate analysis, only catheter drainages and head-neck interventions were significantly at risk (p=0.019 and p=0.004) to be canceled or aborted, with odds ratios of 2.677 (95% CI 1.178-6.083) and 6.956 (95% CI 1.883-25.691), respectively. Of 52 canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions, 14 (26.9%) were repeated, 19 (36.5%) underwent a different non-CT-guided interventional procedure on the same target, and 19 (36.5%) did not undergo any subsequent intervention.ConclusionThe frequency of canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions is low, but is not negligible. Awareness of causes and circumstances under which they are more likely to occur may reduce the number of canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions.Key Points center dot Approximately 1.7% of CT-guided interventions, for which the patient physically shows up at the CT room and which are considered useful by the radiologist, are eventually canceled or aborted.center dot Main causes (of which some may be prevented) are pain, lack of a safe window, impossibility to position the co-axial or biopsy needle, inability to lie still, dyspnea, non-discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy, and impossibility to aspirate liquid or advance the catheter when attempting drainage.center dot CT-guided catheter drainages and head-neck interventions are particularly prone to being canceled or aborted.
引用
收藏
页码:3372 / 3378
页数:7
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Radiation exposure during CT-guided biopsies: recent CT machines provide markedly lower doses
    Guberina, Nika
    Forsting, Michael
    Ringelstein, Adrian
    Suntharalingam, Saravanabavaan
    Nassenstein, Kai
    Theysohn, Jens
    Wetter, Axel
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (09) : 3929 - 3935
  • [2] Interventional CT: 30 years' experience
    Haaga, JR
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 : D116 - D120
  • [3] PRECISE BIOPSY LOCALIZATION BY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
    HAAGA, JR
    ALFIDI, RJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1976, 118 (03) : 603 - 607
  • [4] Radiation exposure in CT-guided interventions
    Kloeckner, Roman
    dos Santos, Daniel Pinto
    Schneider, Jens
    Kara, Levent
    Dueber, Christoph
    Pitton, Michael B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (12) : 2253 - 2257
  • [5] Complications in CT-guided Procedures: Do We Really Need Postinterventional CT Control Scans?
    Nattenmueller, Johanna
    Filsinger, Matthias
    Bryant, Mark
    Stiller, Wolfram
    Radeleff, Boris
    Grenacher, Lars
    Kauczor, Hans-Ullrich
    Hosch, Waldemar
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (01) : 241 - 246