The Regulation of Redistribution: Managing Conflict in Corporate Tax Competition

被引:11
作者
Kemmerling, Achim
Seils, Eric
机构
[1] Institute for Social and Economic Research (WSI), Hans-Böckler Foundation
关键词
LESS HARMFUL; TAXATION;
D O I
10.1080/01402380902945433
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Although the EU is not a tax state in itself, European regulations have a considerable impact on national tax policies. This article analyses the role of the EU by a comparison of two forms of corporate tax competition: general competition on rates, and targeted competition in the form of preferential tax regimes. The EU failed to coordinate tax rate competition but managed to curtail 'harmful' targeted competition by a combination of soft and hard law. The authors argue that the differing performance of the EU is due to differences in the underlying conflict structures between small and large countries. Whereas both small and large countries are equally affected by targeted competition, small countries are usually winners of general tax competition on rates. By restricting its problem definition to 'harmful' targeted competition, the EU was able to make some headway in that area, but this only reshaped rather than impeded overall corporate tax competition.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 773
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Official Journal of the European Communities
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1495 CESIFO
[3]  
[Anonymous], EUROPEANIZING CORPOR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, REPORT COMMITTEE IND
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, HARMF TAX COMP EM GL
[6]  
*BAK MCKENZIE, 1999, SURV EFF TAX BURD EU
[7]  
Baldwin R., 1997, Economic Policy, V24, P125
[8]  
*BMF, 2007, EINH BEM KORP EUR UN
[9]   ASYMMETRIC TAX COMPETITION [J].
BUCOVETSKY, S .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1991, 30 (02) :167-181
[10]  
CATTOIR P, 2006, TAXATION PAPERS EURO, V10