Everybody Thinks We Should but Nobody Does: How Combined Injunctive and Descriptive Norms Motivate Organ Donor Registration

被引:34
作者
Habib, Rishad [1 ]
White, Katherine [1 ]
Hoegg, JoAndrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Descriptive norms; Injunctive norms; Organ donation; Prosocial behavior; Social influence; COGNITIVE-DISSONANCE; INTERVENTION; BEHAVIOR; HYPOCRISY; APPEALS;
D O I
10.1002/jcpy.1220
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The potential for deceased-donor organ transplants to save lives is severely limited by the number of people registered as donors around the world. Various national and regional health organizations often emphasize low registration rates (i.e., low descriptive norms) in an effort to demonstrate need and encourage registration. However, we predict and find that combining low descriptive norms with high injunctive norms, making salient the discrepancy between what people think they should do and what they actually do, results in greater organ donor registrations than communicating either descriptive or injunctive norms separately. We demonstrate these effects across three focal studies and two follow-up studies conducted online, in the laboratory, and in the field, and show that the findings are mediated by feelings of responsibility. We also demonstrate that making the situation feel psychologically close increases responsibility and intentions to register for low descriptive and high injunctive norms, to the level of combined norms. Our research contributes to the literature on norms and responsibility and can help policymakers and marketers design more effective communication strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 630
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[2]  
Block L.G., 1997, J Consum Psychol, V6, P31, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15327663JCP060102, 10.1207/s15327663jcp0601_02]
[3]  
Cialdini R.B., 1991, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V24, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601
[4]   A FOCUS THEORY OF NORMATIVE CONDUCT - RECYCLING THE CONCEPT OF NORMS TO REDUCE LITTERING IN PUBLIC PLACES [J].
CIALDINI, RB ;
RENO, RR ;
KALLGREN, CA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 58 (06) :1015-1026
[5]   Social influence: Compliance and conformity [J].
Cialdini, RB ;
Goldstein, NJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 55 :591-621
[6]   ON THE MOTIVATIONAL NATURE OF COGNITIVE-DISSONANCE - DISSONANCE AS PSYCHOLOGICAL DISCOMFORT [J].
ELLIOT, AJ ;
DEVINE, PG .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (03) :382-394
[7]   Is There Any Hope? How Climate Change News Imagery and Text Influence Audience Emotions and Support for Climate Mitigation Policies [J].
Feldman, Lauren ;
Hart, P. Sol .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2018, 38 (03) :585-602
[8]   COGNITIVE DISSONANCE [J].
FESTINGER, L .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1962, 207 (04) :93-&
[9]   Vicarious hypocrisy: Bolstering attitudes and taking action after exposure to a hypocritical ingroup member [J].
Focella, Elizabeth S. ;
Stone, Jeff ;
Fernandez, Nicholas C. ;
Cooper, Joel ;
Hogg, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 62 :89-102
[10]   Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect [J].
Garcia, SM ;
Weaver, K ;
Moskowitz, GB ;
Darley, JM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (04) :843-853