Evaluation of a workplace cardiovascular health promotion programme in the Republic of Ireland

被引:15
作者
McMahon, A [1 ]
Kelleher, CC [1 ]
Helly, G [1 ]
Duffy, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Ireland, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Hlth Promot, Ctr Hlth Promot Studies, Galway, Ireland
关键词
cardiovascular health promotion; programme evaluation; workplace health promotion;
D O I
10.1093/heapro/17.4.297
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper describes a comprehensive evaluation of the organizational impact of a workplace health promotion programme, in the context of a framework devised by Nutbeam in 1998. The Happy Heart at Work programme, sponsored by the Irish Heart Foundation, has been in existence for 10 years and aims to promote a healthy lifestyle through specially devised modular materials. A postal census survey of 785 valid registered sites expressing any level of initial interest in the programme yielded a 40% response rate (n = 311). Of these, 194 (63%) were currently active and 114 were not. Active organizations were less likely to be Irish owned (54.5% versus 71.4%, p < 0.05), and more likely to operate in shifts (72.3% versus 51.1%, p < 0.05) or to have an occupational physician amongst the staff (36.9% versus 31%). Programme impact within active organizations, based on pre-defined Health Promoting Workplace parameters, was documented. There was agreement in the questionnaire responses that participating organizations promote a smoke-free environment (mean rating on five-point scale = 4.42), employee health and well-being (4.21) and good nutritional practice (4.11). Triangulation of research methods, including a telephone survey of gatekeepers from within organizations (n = 18), focus groups with participant employees (n = 42) and a review of the staff opinions of the facilitating organization on the programme, all showed strong concordance with respect to the strengths and weaknesses of Happy Heart at Work. The programme was felt to help improve employees' lifestyle habits and morale, as well as the company's public image. The main drawbacks of the programme were its relatively low profile, even in actively participating organizations, and the fact that it was not seen to be independently sustainable without intensive and ongoing support.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 308
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FOCUS GROUPS
[2]  
BIENER L, 1994, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V36, P631
[3]   The health-promoting workplace: an integrative perspective [J].
Chu, C ;
Driscoll, T ;
Dwyer, S .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 21 (04) :377-385
[4]  
DEJOY DM, 1993, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V35, P1221
[5]  
*DEP HLTH CHILDR, 1998, HLTH PROM WORKPL HLT
[6]  
*DEP HLTH CHILDR, 1999, ADV GROUP CARD DIS B
[7]   The health impact of worksite nutrition and cholesterol intervention programs [J].
Glanz, K ;
Sorensen, G ;
Farmer, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 1996, 10 (06) :453-470
[8]   DEVELOPMENT OF LEVEL OF INSTITUTIONALIZATION SCALES FOR HEALTH PROMOTION PROGRAMS [J].
GOODMAN, RM ;
MCLEROY, KR ;
STECKLER, AB ;
HOYLE, RH .
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1993, 20 (02) :161-178
[9]  
*HLTH PROM WAL, 1996, HLTH WORK
[10]   Health and safety practices among farmers and other workers: a needs assessment [J].
Hope, A ;
Kelleher, C ;
Holmes, L ;
Hennessy, T .
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 1999, 49 (04) :231-235