A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning

被引:168
作者
Schmidt-Weigand, Florian [1 ]
Kohnert, Alfred [2 ]
Glowalla, Ulrich [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kassel, Inst Psychol, D-34109 Kassel, Germany
[2] Univ Giessen, Dept Psychol, D-35394 Giessen, Germany
关键词
Multimedia learning; Split attention; Eye tracking; Text modality; Pacing of instruction; MODALITY; TEXT;
D O I
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.011
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Two experiments examined visual attention distribution in learning from text and pictures. Participants watched a 16-step multimedia instruction on the formation of lightning. In Experiment 1 (N = 90) the instruction was system-paced (fast, medium, slow pace), while it was self-paced in Experiment 2 (N = 31). In both experiments the text modality was varied (written, spoken). During teaming, the participants' eye movements were recorded. Results from both experiments revealed that learners spent more time studying the visualizations with spoken text than those with written text. In written text conditions learners consistently started reading before alternating between text and visualization; moreover, they spent more time reading the text than inspecting the visualizations. While in Experiment I additional time that was made available in conditions with a slow or medium instruction pace was spent inspecting visualizations, in Experiment 2 longer learning times resulted from reading the text more intensively. With respect to learning outcomes (retention, transfer, and visual memory) Experiment I revealed an effect of text modality for visual memory only. In Experiment 2 no modality effects were found. Instruction pace was hardly related to learning outcomes. Overall, the results confirm prior findings suggesting that the distribution of visual attention in multimedia learning is largely guided by the text. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 110
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Baddeley A., 1986, Working Memory Oxford.
[2]  
Boucheix JM, 2008, LEARNING WITH ANIMATION: RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGN, P208
[3]  
d'Ydewalle G., 1992, EYE MOVEMENTS VISUAL, P415, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-2852-325, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-2852-3_25, 10.1007/978-1-4612-2852-325]
[4]   Meta-analysis of the modality effect [J].
Ginns, P .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2005, 15 (04) :313-331
[5]   READING SPEED AND PROSE MEMORY IN OLDER AND YOUNGER ADULTS [J].
HARTLEY, JT ;
STOJACK, CC ;
MUSHANEY, TJ ;
ANNON, TAK ;
LEE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1994, 9 (02) :216-223
[6]   CONSTRUCTING MENTAL MODELS OF MACHINES FROM TEXT AND DIAGRAMS [J].
HEGARTY, M ;
JUST, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1993, 32 (06) :717-742
[7]   Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text:: Evidence from eye fixation patterns [J].
Hyönä, J ;
Lorch, RF ;
Kaakinen, JK .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 94 (01) :44-55
[8]  
Just M.A., 1987, The Psychology of reading and language comprehension
[9]  
Low R., 2005, Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, P147, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139547369.010, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.010, 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.012, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.012]
[10]  
*MACR, 1999, FLASH 4 0 COMP PROGR