Identification of Vertebral Fractures by Convolutional Neural Networks to Predict Nonvertebral and Hip Fractures: A Registry-based Cohort Study of Dual X-ray Absorptiometry

被引:53
作者
Derkatch, Sheldon [1 ]
Kirby, Christopher [1 ,2 ]
Kimelman, Douglas [1 ,2 ]
Jozani, Mohammad Jafari [1 ]
Davidson, J. Michael [1 ]
Leslie, William D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Radiol, 820 Sherbrook St,GA216, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] St Boniface Gen Hosp, Albrechtsen Res Ctr, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
关键词
AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019190201
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Detection of vertebral fractures (VFs) aids in management of osteoporosis and targeting of fracture prevention therapies. Purpose: To determine whether convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be trained to identify VFs at VF assessment (VFA) performed with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and if VFs identified by CNNs confer a similar prognosis compared with the expert reader reference standard. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 12 742 routine clinical VFA images obtained from February 2010 to December 2017 and reported as VF present or absent were used for CNN training and testing. All reporting physicians were diagnostic imaging specialists with at least 10 years of experience. Randomly selected training and validation sets were used to produce a CNN ensemble that calculates VF probability. A test set (30%; 3822 images) was used to assess CNN agreement with the human expert reader reference standard and CNN prediction of incident non-VFs. Statistical analyses included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, two-tailed Student t tests, prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa value, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: This study included 12 742 patients (mean age, 76 years 6 7; 12 013 women). The CNN ensemble demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93, 0.95) for VF detection that corresponded to sensitivity of 87.4% (534 of 611), specificity of 88.4% (2838 of 3211), and prevalence- and bias-adjusted k value of 0.77. On the basis of incident fracture data available for 2813 patients (mean follow up, 3.7 years), hazard ratios adjusted for baseline fracture probability were 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3, 2.2) for CNN versus 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3, 2.3) for expert reader-detected VFs for incident non-VF and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.5, 3.5) versus 2.4 (95% CI: 1.5, 3.7) for incident hip fracture. Conclusion: Convolutional neural networks can identify vertebral fractures on vertebral fracture assessment images with high accuracy, and these convolutional neural network-identified vertebral fractures predict clinical fracture outcomes. (C)RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 411
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Reproducibility of Vertebral Fracture Assessment Readings From Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Both a Population-based and Clinical Cohort: Cohen's and Uniform Kappa [J].
Aubry-Rozier, Berengere ;
Chapurlat, Roland ;
Duboeuf, Francois ;
Iglesias, Katia ;
Krieg, Marc-Antoine ;
Lamy, Olivier ;
Burnand, Bernard ;
Hans, Didier .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2015, 18 (02) :233-238
[2]   BIAS, PREVALENCE AND KAPPA [J].
BYRT, T ;
BISHOP, J ;
CARLIN, JB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (05) :423-429
[3]   UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [J].
Compston, J. ;
Cooper, A. ;
Cooper, C. ;
Gittoes, N. ;
Gregson, C. ;
Harvey, N. ;
Hope, S. ;
Kanis, J. A. ;
McCloskey, E. V. ;
Poole, K. E. S. ;
Reid, D. M. ;
Selby, P. ;
Thompson, F. ;
Thurston, A. ;
Vine, N. .
ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2017, 12 (01)
[4]   Clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis (vol 25, pg 2359, 2014) [J].
Cosman, F. ;
de Beur, S. J. ;
LeBoff, M. S. ;
Lewiecki, E. M. ;
Tanner, B. ;
Randall, S. ;
Lindsay, R. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 26 (07) :2045-2047
[5]   Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis [J].
Damilakis, John ;
Adams, Judith E. ;
Guglielmi, Giuseppe ;
Link, Thomas M. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (11) :2707-2714
[6]   Algorithm-based qualitative and semiquantitative identification of prevalent vertebral fracture: Agreement between different readers, imaging modalities, and diagnostic approaches [J].
Ferrar, Lynne ;
Jiang, Guirong ;
Schousboe, John T. ;
DeBold, Charles R. ;
Eastell, Richard .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2008, 23 (03) :417-424
[7]   Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis [J].
Jiang, G ;
Eastell, R ;
Barrington, NA ;
Ferrar, L .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 15 (11) :887-896
[8]   A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk [J].
Kanis, JA ;
Johnell, O ;
De Laet, C ;
Johansson, H ;
Oden, A ;
Delmas, P ;
Eisman, J ;
Fujiwara, S ;
Garnero, P ;
Kroger, H ;
McCloskey, EV ;
Mellstrom, D ;
Melton, LJ ;
Pols, H ;
Reeve, J ;
Silman, A ;
Tenenhouse, A .
BONE, 2004, 35 (02) :375-382
[9]   Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: A summary of the literature and statistical synthesis [J].
Klotzbuecher, CM ;
Ross, PD ;
Landsman, PB ;
Abbott, TA ;
Berger, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2000, 15 (04) :721-739
[10]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174