A Mixed-Methods Study of Two Modes of the Circle of Security

被引：1

作者：

Sadowski, Christina ^{[1
]}

Goff, Rachel ^{[1
]}

Sawyer, Neroli ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Federat Univ Australia, Sch Arts, Mt Helen, Vic, Australia

来源：

RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE | 2022年 / 32卷 / 01期

关键词：

circle of security; mixed-methods; methodological article; attachment; child welfare; field of practice; group work interventions; social work interventions; child and family social work; parenting; PARENTING PROGRAMS; CHILD; IMPLEMENTATION; INTERVENTIONS; ATTACHMENT; EFFICACY; MOTHERS; ABUSE;

D O I：

10.1177/10497315211009315

中图分类号：

C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];

学科分类号：

1204 ;

摘要：

Purpose: This study compared the impact, challenges, and benefits of the Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) intervention across two delivery modes: group center-based (GCCOS-P) and individual home-based (IHCOS-P). Methods: This mixed-methods study compared the impact of the COS-P on parental reflective functioning and parental stress across two delivery modes: GCCOS-P (n = 7) and IHCOS-P (n = 7). It compared the challenges and benefits of each, from the qualitative perspectives of participants (n = 2 IHCOS-P; n = 3 GCCOS-P) and facilitators (n = 4). Results: Quantitative statistical analysis comparing pre- and postintervention measures suggest that each delivery mode was equally effective in reducing parental stress and generally noneffective with respect to parental reflective functioning. Challenges and benefits of each mode, inherent in the peer/shared learning environment of the GCOS-P and the individualized, flexible delivery of the IHCOS-P, were identified. Discussion: This study adds to knowledge about the widely utilized COS-P, highlighting challenges and benefits of two modes of delivery.

引用

页码：49 / 60

页数：12

共 31 条

[21]

Katz I., 2016, Modernising Child Protection in New Zealand: Learning from system reforms in other jurisdictions

[22]

Kohlhoff J., 2016, AUSTR J CHILD FAMILY, V13, P3, DOI DOI 10.3316/INFORMIT.140733276138781

[23] Preventing child abuse: A meta-analysis of parent training programs [J].

Lundahl, BW ;

Nimer, J ;

Parsons, B .

RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2006, 16 (03) :251-262

[24] The parental reflective functioning questionnaire: Development and preliminary validation [J].

Luyten, Patrick ;

Mayes, Linda C. ;

Nijssens, Liesbet ;

Fonagy, Peter .

PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05)

[25]

Marvin Robert, 2002, Attach Hum Dev, V4, P107, DOI 10.1080/14616730252982491

[26] DOES TRAINING IN THE CIRCLE OF SECURITY FRAMEWORK INCREASE RELATIONAL UNDERSTANDING IN INFANT/CHILD AND FAMILY WORKERS? [J].

McMahon, Catherine ;

Huber, Anna ;

Kohlhoff, Jane ;

Camberis, Anna-Lisa .

INFANT MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (05) :658-668

[27] Examining Circle of Security: A Review of Research and Theory [J].

Mercer, Jean .

RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2015, 25 (03) :382-392

[28]

MOORE T, 2016, SUPPORTING ROADMAP R

[29] Implementation of attachment-based interventions in mental health and social welfare services: Therapist's experiences from the Circle of Security-Virginia Family intervention [J].

Nielsen, Bettina ;

Oddli, Hanne Weie ;

Slinning, Kari ;

Drozd, Filip .

CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2020, 108

[30] The circle of security parenting and parental conflict: a single case study [J].

Pazzagli, Chiara ;

Laghezza, Loredana ;

Manaresi, Francesca ;

Mazzeschi, Claudia ;

Powell, Bert .

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5

← 1 2 3 4 →