The recognition and rejection of self-incompatible pollen in the Brassicaceae

被引:0
|
作者
Haasen, Katrina E. [1 ]
Goring, Daphne R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Cell & Syst Biol, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Ctr Anal Genome Evolut & Funct, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Actin; ARC1; Exo70A1; MLPK; SCR/SP11; Self-incompatibility; SRK; LOCUS RECEPTOR KINASE; S-LOCUS; STIGMA INTERACTIONS; ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA; COAT PROTEIN; DRY STIGMAS; NAPUS-CV; OLERACEA; GENE; DOMAIN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Sporophytic self-incompatibility in the Brassicaceae is a reproductive strategy that prevents self-fertilization, and as a result, allows genetic diversity to be maintained. The conserved 'self' pollen recognition system is necessary due to the close proximity of male and female reproductive organs in the flower. This elaborate system is regulated by two tightly-linked polymorphic S genes encoding the pollen-coat protein S Cysteine-Rich/S Protein-11 (SCR/SP11) and the stigma-specific S Receptor Kinase (SRK). When the pollen is recognized as 'self', SCR/SP11 binds and activates SRK, and a signaling cascade is triggered in the stigma. While it is known that this signaling pathway leads to rejection of 'self' pollen, the cellular events downstream of SRK are less well understood. More recent research has identified new signaling proteins functioning downstream of SRK, Such as the M Locus Protein Kinase (MLPK) and the ARM-Repeat Containing-1 (ARC1) an E3 ubiquitin ligase. As well, changes in the actin cytoskeleton have been documented. Finally, with the premise that pollen rejection occurs by blocking cellular responses in the stigma required for the acceptance of compatible pollen, Exo70A1 has been identified as a 'compatibility' factor that is negatively regulated by the self-incompatibility pathway.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Secretory Activity Is Rapidly Induced in Stigmatic Papillae by Compatible Pollen, but Inhibited for Self-Incompatible Pollen in the Brassicaceae
    Safavian, Darya
    Goring, Daphne R.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [2] Autophagy is required for self-incompatible pollen rejection in two transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana accessions
    Macgregor, Stuart R.
    Lee, Hyun Kyung
    Nelles, Hayley
    Johnson, Daniel C.
    Zhang, Tong
    Ma, Chaozhi
    Goring, Daphne R.
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 188 (04) : 2073 - 2084
  • [3] IS THE REJECTION REACTION INDUCING ABILITY IN SPOROPHYTIC SELF-INCOMPATIBLE SYSTEMS RESTRICTED ONLY TO POLLEN AND TAPETUM
    SOOD, R
    PRABHA, K
    GUPTA, SC
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1982, 63 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [4] MENTOR POLLEN EFFECT ON THE INVIVO GERMINATION OF SELF-INCOMPATIBLE APPLE POLLEN
    MONTALTI, P
    FILITI, N
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 1984, 23 (04) : 337 - 343
  • [5] Signalling to programmed cell death in self-incompatible pollen
    Bosch, M.
    de Graaf, B.
    Poulter, N.
    Vatovec, S.
    Li, S.
    Franklin-Tong, V.
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY A-MOLECULAR & INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 150 (03): : S144 - S144
  • [6] Characterization of the pollen growth transition in self-incompatible Petunia inflata
    Lubliner, N
    Singh-Cundy, DT
    Singh-Cundy, A
    SEXUAL PLANT REPRODUCTION, 2003, 15 (05): : 243 - 253
  • [7] Characterization of the pollen growth transition in self-incompatible Petunia inflata
    Nathan Lubliner
    Donald T. Singh-Cundy
    Anu Singh-Cundy
    Sexual Plant Reproduction, 2003, 15 : 243 - 253
  • [8] ON THE EFFECT OF SPECIES-FOREIGN POLLEN ON SELF-INCOMPATIBLE GUAYULE
    GERSTEL, DU
    GENETICS, 1950, 35 (06) : 666 - 666
  • [9] PROMOTION OF THE GROWTH OF SELF-INCOMPATIBLE POLLEN TUBES IN LILY BY CAMP
    TEZUKA, T
    HIRATSUKA, S
    TAKAHASHI, SY
    PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 34 (06) : 955 - 958
  • [10] S RNase and interspecific pollen rejection in the genus Nicotiana: Multiple pollen-rejection pathways contribute to unilateral incompatibility between self-incompatible and self-compatible species
    Murfett, J
    Strabala, TJ
    Zurek, DM
    Mou, BQ
    Beecher, B
    McClure, BA
    PLANT CELL, 1996, 8 (06): : 943 - 958