The cognitive, emotional, and social sequelae of stroke: Psychological and ethical concerns in post-stroke adaptation

被引:75
作者
Mukherjee, Debjani [1 ]
Levin, Rebecca L.
Heller, Wendy
机构
[1] Rehabil Inst Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
acquired brain injury anxiety; clinical ethics; depression; disability stigma; identity;
D O I
10.1310/tsr1304-26
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
In the clinical domain, ethical analyses involve examination of complex individual responses, psychological processes, and social context. Psychological aspects of stroke adaptation include the risk for depression and anxiety, changes in identity and personality processes, and potential for social isolation. Depression and anxiety are heterogeneous constructs and can affect individuals' emotional functioning and cognitive abilities. Executive function, self-agency, and volition may be affected. Alterations in identity and personality may also result from the interaction of fluctuating emotional, cognitive, and physical abilities as well as from changes in social context and family dynamics. Social isolation, or lack of access to social contact or resources, can be a consequence of difficulties in cognitive and emotional function that influence interpersonal relationships, changes in social roles, communication difficulties, and challenges in transportation and employment. Social stigma and marginalization also contribute to isolation. The authors describe these psychological phenomena in the context of brain damage and recovery and raise ethical concerns including impact on decision-making capacity, pre- and postinjury selves and interests, and the social milieu in which strokes are experienced.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 35
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Albrecht GaryL., 2001, Handbook of disability studies
  • [2] American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Text revision (DSM-IV-TR), V4th, DOI [10.1176/dsm10.1176/appi.books.9780890420249.dsm-iv-tr, DOI 10.1176/DSM10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890420249.DSM-IV-TR]
  • [3] [Anonymous], NAT HEALTHC DISP REP
  • [4] ASSESSING PATIENTS CAPACITIES TO CONSENT TO TREATMENT
    APPELBAUM, PS
    GRISSO, T
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 319 (25) : 1635 - 1638
  • [5] BANICH MT, 1992, NEUROPSY NEUROPSY BE, V5, P20
  • [6] Beauchamp TL, 2001, Principles of Biomedical Ethics
  • [7] Social isolation and outcomes post stroke
    Boden-Albala, B
    Litwak, E
    Elkind, MSV
    Rundek, T
    Sacco, RL
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2005, 64 (11) : 1888 - 1892
  • [8] Ethics, family caregivers, and stroke
    Brashler, Rebecca
    [J]. TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2006, 13 (04) : 11 - 17
  • [9] Living with stroke: a phenomenological study
    Burton, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2000, 32 (02) : 301 - 309
  • [10] Cherney Leora Reiff, 2004, Top Stroke Rehabil, V11, P22