Caesarean delivery and risk of stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study in an English population

被引:54
作者
Gray, R.
Quigley, M. A.
Hockley, C.
Kurinczuk, J. J.
Goldacre, M.
Brocklehurst, P.
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Publ Hlth, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol Unit, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Publ Hlth, Unit Hlth Care Epidemiol, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
关键词
caesarean section; cohort study; pregnancy; stillbirth;
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01249.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Two recent studies indicate an increased risk of stillbirth in the pregnancy that follows a pregnancy delivered by caesarean section. In this study, we report an analysis designed to test the hypothesis that delivery by caesarean section is a risk factor for explained or unexplained stillbirth in any subsequent pregnancy. We also report on the proportion of stillbirths in our study population, which may have been attributable to previous delivery by caesarean section. Design Retrospective cohort study. Population Linked statistical data set of 81 784 singleton deliveries registered in Oxfordshire and West Berkshire between 1968 and 1989. Methods The crude and adjusted hazard ratios for stillbirth in deliveries following a previous delivery by caesarean section, compared with no previous caesarean, were estimated using Cox regression. Main outcome measure Stillbirth. Results The unadjusted hazard ratios for all, explained, and unexplained stillbirths were 1.54 (95% CI 1.04-2.29); 2.13 (1.22-3.72); and 1.19 (0.68-2.09), respectively. After adjustment for maternal age, parity, social class, previous adverse outcome of pregnancy, body mass indexand smoking the hazard ratios were 1.58 (0.95-2.63), 2.08 (1.00-4.31) and 1.24 (0.60-2.56). Conclusions Pregnancies in women following a pregnancy delivered by caesarean section are at an increased risk of stillbirth. In our study, the risk appears to be mainly concentrated in the subgroup of explained stillbirths. However, there are sufficient inconsistencies in the developing literature about stillbirth risk that further research is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 270
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, International classification of diseases, clinical modification: Ninth revision, tenth edition
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, CAES SECT CLIN GUID
[3]   CLASSIFYING PERINATAL DEATH - AN OBSTETRIC APPROACH [J].
COLE, SK ;
HEY, EN ;
THOMSON, AM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1986, 93 (12) :1204-1212
[4]  
*CONF ENQ MAT CHIL, 2006, PER MORT SURV REP
[5]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[6]   Use of large medical databases to study associations between diseases [J].
Goldacre, M ;
Kurina, L ;
Yeates, D ;
Seagroatt, V ;
Gill, L .
QJM-MONTHLY JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS, 2000, 93 (10) :669-675
[7]   TRENDS IN EPISODE BASED AND PERSON BASED RATES OF ADMISSION TO HOSPITAL IN THE OXFORD RECORD LINKAGE STUDY AREA [J].
GOLDACRE, MJ ;
SIMMONS, H ;
HENDERSON, J ;
GILL, LE .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 296 (6621) :583-585
[8]   Impact of Caesarean section on future pregnancy - A review of cohort studies [J].
Hemminki, E .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 10 (04) :366-379
[9]   Economic implications of multiple births: inpatient hospital costs in the first 5 years of life [J].
Henderson, J ;
Hockley, C ;
Petrou, S ;
Goldacre, M ;
Davidson, L .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2004, 89 (06) :F542-F545
[10]  
Huber P. J., 1981, ROBUST STAT