Male and Female Characteristics of Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in Different Orthodontic Malocclusions Evaluated by Cephalometric Radiography

被引:24
作者
Perovic, Tatjana [1 ,2 ]
Blazej, Zorica [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nis, Med Fac, Nish, Serbia
[2] Dent Clin, Dept Orthodont, Nish, Serbia
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2018年 / 24卷
关键词
Face; Malocclusion; Sex Characteristics; FACE; PROFILE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.907485
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The facial profile is determined by the facial soft tissue thickness (FSTT) and dentoskeletal characteristics. The aim of this study was to compare male and female characteristics of FSTT in different orthodontic malocclusions using cephalometric radiography. Material/Methods: One hundred and twenty lateral cephalometric radiography-derived cephalograms of adult male (n=47) and female (n=73) orthodontic patients, aged between 16-22 years were classified according to their dentoskeletal relationships as Class I (n=30), Class II Division 1 (n=30), Class II Division 2 (n=30), Class III (n=30). Burstone analysis of seven linear dimensions of FSTT was used. Results: Men had a thicker FSTT in dentoskeletal relationships Class I, Class II Division 2, and Class III. Sex differences varied from significant (t=2.056; p<0.05) for the sub-nasal area in Class II Division 2, to highly significant (t=3.772; p<0.001) for the upper lip sulcus in Class II Division 2. Women in Class II Division 1 had significantly thicker FSTT in the lower jaw area (t=2.800; p<0.01) and for the lower lip sulcus and the chin area (t=3.961; p<0.001). Conclusions: Men with orthodontic malocclusions were characterized by thicker facial soft tissue compared with female patients in Class I and Class II Division 2; female patients in Class II Division 1 were characterized by thicker facial soft tissue of the mentolabial sulcus and chin. Men and women with a skeletal jaw relationship in Class III showed no significant difference in their FSTT.
引用
收藏
页码:3415 / 3424
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Aggarwal I., 2016, Indian J Dent Sci, V8, P124, DOI [10.4103/0976-4003.191731, DOI 10.4103/0976-4003.191731]
[2]  
Ahangar Atashi Mohammad Hossein, 2008, J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, V2, P53, DOI 10.5681/joddd.2008.011
[3]  
Al-Mashhadany SM, 2017, INT J SCI RES, V6, P938, DOI [10.21275/ART2017603, DOI 10.21275/ART2017603]
[4]  
AlBarakati SF, 2011, SAUDI MED J, V32, P836
[5]   Soft tissue thickness values for black and coloured South African children aged 6-13 years [J].
Briers, N. ;
Briers, T. M. ;
Becker, P. J. ;
Steyn, M. .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 252 :188.e1-188.e10
[6]   Facial reconstruction: Soft tissue thickness values for South African black females [J].
Cavanagh, D. ;
Steyn, M. .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 206 (1-3) :215.e1-215.e7
[7]   Assessment of the soft tissue thickness at the lower anterior face in adult patients with different skeletal vertical patterns using cone-beam computed tomography [J].
Celikoglu, Mevlut ;
Buyuk, Suleyman K. ;
Ekizer, Abdullah ;
Sekerci, Ahmet E. ;
Sisman, Yildiray .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2015, 85 (02) :211-217
[8]   Age and sex related measurement of craniofacial soft tissue thickness and nasal profile in the Chinese population [J].
Chen, Feng ;
Chen, Yanjiong ;
Yu, Yanfang ;
Qiang, Yongqian ;
Liu, Mingjun ;
Fulton, David ;
Chen, Teng .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 212 (1-3) :272.e1-272.e6
[9]   Facial soft tissue thicknesses in the present Czech Population [J].
Drgacova, Anna ;
Dupej, Jan ;
Veleminska, Jana .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 260 :106.e1-106.e7
[10]  
Feres Murilo Fernando Neuppmann, 2010, Dental Press J. Orthod., V15, P84