Unresponsiveness to factor VIII inhibitor bypassing agents during haemostatic treatment for life-threatening massive bleeding in a patient with haemophilia A and a high responding inhibitor

被引:54
作者
Hayashi, T
Tanaka, I [1 ]
Shima, M
Yoshida, K
Fukuda, K
Sakurai, Y
Matsumoto, T
Giddings, JC
Yoshioka, A
机构
[1] Nara Med Univ, Dept Pediat, Nara 6348522, Japan
[2] Univ Wales Coll Cardiff, Coll Med, Dept Haematol, Cardiff CF1 3NS, S Glam, Wales
关键词
factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity; haemophilia A; inhibitor; thrombelastography;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.00924.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We report a case of haemophilia A with a high responding inhibitor of factor VIII (FVIII) who had a serious retroperitoneal haematoma caused by penetration of a duodenal ulcer. Inhibitor-bypassing therapy was commenced immediately on admission. On the 17th day of treatment with activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC; FEIBA(R)), re-bleeding occurred and thrombelastography (TEG) demonstrated resistance to therapy. Treatment was changed to recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven(R)) and resulted in clinical improvement together with an improvement in TEG parameters. On the 10th day of continuous infusion with NovoSeven(R), however, TEG again showed resistance to therapy. FEIBA(R) infusions were re-introduced and TEG results remained satisfactory for 7 days. On day 34, however, further retroperitoneal bleeding was evident and a decline in the haemostatic efficiency of FEIBA(R) was recorded by TEG. NovoSeven(R) was again successfully administered for 7 days. There were no laboratory findings to indicate disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), hypercoagulability or abnormal fibrinolysis. The plasma-based clotting tests did not show any additional prolongation on the occasions when the TEG demonstrated unresponsiveness to FEIBA(R) or NovoSeven(R). These findings suggested that some component of whole blood, other than plasma might have governed the TEG data. The long-term use of APCC such as FEIBA(R) or rFVIIa, requires careful monitoring in terms of FVIII inhibitor bypassing activity as well as the tendency to DIC.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 400
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THROMB HAEMOST
[2]  
[Anonymous], HAEMOPHILIA
[3]  
Caprini JA, 1995, SEMIN THROMB HEMOST, V21, P91
[4]   Safety of factor VIII inhibitor bypass activity (FEIBA®):: 10-year compilation of thrombotic adverse events [J].
Ehrlich, HJ ;
Henzl, MJ ;
Gomperts, ED .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2002, 8 (02) :83-90
[5]   LABORATORY EVIDENCE OF DIC UNDER FEIBA TREATMENT OF A HEMOPHILIC PATIENT WITH INTRA-CRANICAL BLEEDING AND HIGH TITER FACTOR-VIII INHIBITOR [J].
FUKUI, H ;
FUJIMURA, Y ;
TAKAHASHI, Y ;
MIKAMI, S ;
YOSHIOKA, A .
THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 1981, 22 (1-2) :177-184
[6]  
Guillet B, 2002, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V88, P698
[7]  
KARAYALCIN G, 1993, AM J PEDIAT HEMATOL, V15, P416
[8]  
Key NS, 2002, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V88, P60
[9]   Clinical experience with recombinant factor VIIa [J].
Lusher, J ;
Ingerslev, J ;
Roberts, H ;
Hedner, U .
BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 1998, 9 (02) :119-128
[10]  
LUSHER JM, 1984, SCAND J HAEMATOL, V33, P195