Conservation efficiency of geopolitical coordination in the EU

被引:32
作者
Bladt, Jesper [1 ]
Strange, Niels [3 ]
Abildtrup, Jens [4 ]
Svenning, Jens-Christian [2 ]
Skov, Flemming [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Natl Environm Res Inst Denmark, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Biodivers, DK-8410 Ronde, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biol Sci, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Life Sci, Div Econ Policy & Management Planning, Ctr Forest Landscape & Planning, DK-1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Life Sci, Inst Food & Resource Econ, DK-1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
Conservation costs; Reserve selection; Scale; AGRICULTURAL LAND VALUES; RESERVE SELECTION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INTEGRATING COSTS; INDICATOR GROUPS; SOUTH-AFRICA; DIVERSITY; AREAS; IDENTIFICATION; DISTRIBUTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jnc.2008.12.003
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
This study examines the scope for efficiency gains in geopolitical. coordination between the European Union member states. The increasing number of member states and the implementation of conservation actions at many different administrative levels indicate that geopolitical. coordination will become increasingly important. The potential scale of efficiency gains is examined, using data on the distribution of 2676 plant species and 181 mammal species and data on the cost of reducing agricultural production as an illustrative measure of conservation cost. The study indicates there may be considerable improvements in species representation if conservation efforts between EU member states are coordinated. The current data set implies increased resource allocation to the southern parts of the EU, due to high numbers of range-restricted species. Surprisingly, coordination also involves increased allocation of resources to regions with high conservation costs. (C) 2008 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 86
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation [J].
Ando, A ;
Camm, J ;
Polasky, S ;
Solow, A .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5359) :2126-2128
[2]   Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050 [J].
Bakkenes, M ;
Alkemade, JRM ;
Ihle, F ;
Leemans, R ;
Latour, JB .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2002, 8 (04) :390-407
[3]   Integrating costs of conservation into international priority setting [J].
Balmford, A ;
Gaston, KJ ;
Rodrigues, ASL ;
James, A .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (03) :597-605
[4]   Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs [J].
Balmford, A ;
Gaston, KJ ;
Blyth, S ;
James, A ;
Kapos, V .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (03) :1046-1050
[5]  
Barberan R., 2005, European Environment, V15, P161, DOI 10.1002/eet.380
[6]   Evidence of capitalization of direct government payments into US cropland values [J].
Barnard, CH ;
Whittaker, G ;
Westenbarger, D ;
Ahearn, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 79 (05) :1642-1650
[7]   QUATERNARY REFUGIA OF NORTH EUROPEAN TREES [J].
BENNETT, KD ;
TZEDAKIS, PC ;
WILLIS, KJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 1991, 18 (01) :103-115
[8]   Valuing the diversity of biodiversity [J].
Christie, Mike ;
Hanley, Nick ;
Warren, John ;
Murphy, Kevin ;
Wright, Robert ;
Hyde, Tony .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 58 (02) :304-317
[9]   Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem [J].
Church, RL ;
Stoms, DM ;
Davis, FW .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1996, 76 (02) :105-112
[10]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260