STOCHASTIC CHOICE AND CONSIDERATION SETS

被引：160

作者：

Manzini, Paola ^{[1
,2
]}

Mariotti, Marco ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ St Andrews, Sch Econ & Finance, St Andrews KY16 9AL, Fife, Scotland

[2] IZA Inst Labor Econ, Bonn, Germany

来源：

ECONOMETRICA | 2014年 / 82卷 / 03期

关键词：

Discrete choice; random utility; logit model; Luce model; consideration sets; bounded rationality; revealed preferences; PROBABILISTIC CHOICE; PREFERENCE; MODEL;

D O I：

10.3982/ECTA10575

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

We model a boundedly rational agent who suffers from limited attention. The agent considers each feasible alternative with a given (unobservable) probability, the attention parameter, and then chooses the alternative that maximizes a preference relation within the set of considered alternatives. We show that this random choice rule is the only one for which the impact of removing an alternative on the choice probability of any other alternative is asymmetric and menu independent. Both the preference relation and the attention parameters are identified uniquely by stochastic choice data.

引用

页码：1153 / 1176

页数：24

共 46 条

[41] Retrieving Unobserved Consideration Sets from Household Panel Data [J].

van Nierop, Erjen ;

Bronnenberg, Bart ;

Paap, Richard ;

Wedel, Michel ;

Franses, Philip Hans .

JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2010, 47 (01) :63-74

[42] Probabilistic choice in games:: Properties of Rosenthal's t-solutions [J].

Voorneveld, M .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GAME THEORY, 2006, 34 (01) :105-121

[43] Consideration sets and political choices: A heterogeneous model of vote choice and sub-national party strength [J].

Wilson, Carole J. .

POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2008, 30 (02) :161-183

[44]

Wright Peter., 1977, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, P91

[45] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LUCES CHOICE AXIOM, THURSTONES THEORY OF COMPARATIVE JUDGMENT, AND DOUBLE EXPONENTIAL-DISTRIBUTION [J].

YELLOTT, JI .

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 15 (02) :109-144

[46]

Yildiz K., 2012, LIST RATIONALIZABLE

← 1 2 3 4 5 →