Empathetic Responsiveness, Group Norms, and Prosocial Affiliations in Bullying Roles

被引:53
作者
Nickerson, Amanda B. [1 ]
Mele-Taylor, Danielle [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Alberti Ctr Bullying Abuse Prevent, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] SUNY Albany, Dept Educ & Counseling Psychol, Albany, NY 12222 USA
关键词
bullying roles; norms; empathy; prosocial affiliations; MIDDLE SCHOOL; AGGRESSION; BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENTS; VICTIMIZATION; PREDICTORS; VICTIMS; FRIENDS; INTERVENTION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1037/spq0000052
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
In this study, the relationships among gender, empathetic responsiveness, perceived group norms, prosocial affiliations, and bullying roles were examined for 262 fifth-through eighth-grade students (n = 141 males; n = 121 females). According to the Bullying Participant Roles Survey (BPRS), participants were identified as defenders (n = 135; 51.5%), victims (n = 48; 18.3%), bullies (n = 39; 14.9%), and outsiders (n = 26; 9.9%). Results of multinominal logistic regression revealed that empathetic responsiveness was a significant predictor of defending behavior and an inverse predictor of outsider behavior. Gender also predicted defending behavior, with boys being more likely to defend than girls. In addition, participants who indicated that their friends supported bullying were more likely to be involved in bullying perpetration and victimization. An unexpected interaction effect between prosocial affiliations and group norms indicated that girls who reported more probullying group norms but whose friends reported having more prosocial tendencies were more likely to assume roles of bullies and victims than outsiders. Implications for practice are outlined, including recommendations for antibullying initiatives.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 109
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Allport G., 1985, Handbook of social psychology, P1
[2]  
Andreou E, 2000, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V26, P49, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(2000)26:1<49::AID-AB4>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-D
[4]   Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors [J].
Barchia, Kirstin ;
Bussey, Kay .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 35 (04) :289-297
[5]  
BERNDT TJ, 1995, CHILD DEV, V66, P1312, DOI 10.2307/1131649
[6]   School factors related to bullying: a qualitative study of early adolescent students [J].
Bibou-Nakou, I. ;
Tsiantis, J. ;
Assimopoulos, H. ;
Chatzilambou, P. ;
Giannakopoulou, D. .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2012, 15 (02) :125-145
[7]   The Impact of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the Organizational Health of Elementary Schools [J].
Bradshaw, Catherine P. ;
Koth, Christine W. ;
Bevans, Katherine B. ;
Ialongo, Nicholas ;
Leaf, Philip J. .
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2008, 23 (04) :462-473
[8]   A Comparison of Self and Peer Reports in the Assessment of Middle School Bullying [J].
Branson, Christopher ;
Cornell, Dewey .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 25 (01) :5-27
[9]  
Brown R., 2019, Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups
[10]   Bullying, education and earnings: Evidence from the National Child Development Study [J].
Brown, Sarah ;
Taylor, Karl .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2008, 27 (04) :387-401