Using Relational Reasoning to Learn About Scientific Phenomena at Unfamiliar Scales

被引:30
作者
Resnick, Ilyse [1 ]
Davatzes, Alexandra [2 ]
Newcombe, Nora S. [3 ]
Shipley, Thomas F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Sch Educ, 211C Willard Hall, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Size and scale; Relational reasoning; Analogy; Progressive alignment; Corrective feedback; STRUCTURAL ALIGNMENT; NUMERICAL ESTIMATION; SIMILARITY COMPARISONS; REPRESENTATIONS; MAGNITUDE; ANALOGIES; NUMBER; EDUCATION; CATEGORIZATION; MISCONCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10648-016-9371-5
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Many scientific theories and discoveries involve reasoning about extreme scales, removed from human experience, such as time in geology and size in nanoscience. Thus, understanding scale is central to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Unfortunately, novices have trouble understanding and comparing sizes of unfamiliar large and small magnitudes. Relational reasoning is a promising tool to bridge the gap between direct experience and phenomena at extreme scales. However, instruction does not always improve understanding, and analogies can fail to bring about conceptual change, and even mislead students. Here, we review how people reason about phenomena across scales, in three sections: (a) we develop a framework for how relational reasoning supports understanding extreme scales; (b) we identify cognitive barriers to aligning human and extreme scales; and (c) we outline a theory-based approach to teaching scale information using relational reasoning, present two successful learning activities, and consider the role of a unified scale instruction across STEM education.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 25
页数:15
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   The functions of multiple representations [J].
Ainsworth, S .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 1999, 33 (2-3) :131-152
[2]  
Alexander PA., 2016, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, V3, P36, DOI [DOI 10.1177/2372732215622029, 10.1177/2372732215622029]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Journal of geoscience education, DOI DOI 10.5408/1089-9995-53.1.17
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, SCI TEACHER
[5]  
[Anonymous], FRAM K 12 SCI ED
[6]  
[Anonymous], ORG INSTRUCTION STUD
[7]   The development of numerical estimation: evidence against a representational shift [J].
Barth, Hilary C. ;
Paladino, Annie M. .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2011, 14 (01) :125-135
[8]   Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation [J].
Booth, JL ;
Siegler, RS .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 42 (01) :189-201
[9]   Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning [J].
Booth, Julie L. ;
Siegler, Robert S. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 79 (04) :1016-1031
[10]   OVERCOMING MISCONCEPTIONS VIA ANALOGICAL REASONING - ABSTRACT TRANSFER VERSUS EXPLANATORY MODEL CONSTRUCTION [J].
BROWN, DE ;
CLEMENT, J .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 1989, 18 (04) :237-261