EFFECTS OF MUTATION BEFORE AND AFTER OFFSPRING SELECTION IN GENETIC PROGRAMMING FOR SYMBOLIC REGRESSION

被引:0
|
作者
Kronberger, Gabriel K. [1 ]
Winkler, Stephan M. [1 ]
Affenzeller, Michael [1 ]
Kommenda, Michael [1 ]
Wagner, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Upper Austria Univ Appl Sci, Josef Ressel Ctr Heurist Optimizat Heureka, Sch Informat Commun & Media, Heurist & Evolut Algorithms Lab, Softwarepk 11, A-4232 Hagenberg, Austria
来源
22ND EUROPEAN MODELING AND SIMULATION SYMPOSIUM (EMSS 2010) | 2010年
关键词
Genetic Programming; Symbolic Regression; Mutation Operators;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In evolutionary algorithms mutation operators increase the genetic diversity in the population. Mutations are undirected and have only a low probability to improve the quality of the manipulated solution. Offspring selection determines if a newly created solution is added to the next generation of the population. By definition, offspring selection is applied after mutation and the effects of mutation are directed and quality-driven. In this paper we propose an alternative variant of genetic programming with offspring selection where mutation is applied to increase genetic diversity after offspring selection. We compare the solution quality achieved by the original algorithm and the new algorithm when applied to a symbolic regression problem. We observe that solutions produced by the new variant have a smaller generalization error and conclude that the proposed variant is better for symbolic regression with linear scaling.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Taylor Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    He, Baihe
    Lu, Qiang
    Yang, Qingyun
    Luo, Jake
    Wang, Zhiguang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'22), 2022, : 946 - 954
  • [2] Statistical genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Haeri, Maryam Amir
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    Folino, Gianluigi
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 60 : 447 - 469
  • [3] Compositional Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Krawiec, Krzysztof
    Kossinski, Dominik
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2022, 2022, : 570 - 573
  • [4] The Inefficiency of Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Kronberger, Gabriel
    de Franca, Fabricio Olivetti
    Desmond, Harry
    Bartlett, Deaglan J.
    Kammerer, Lukas
    PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE-PPSN XVIII, PPSN 2024, PT I, 2024, 15148 : 273 - 289
  • [5] SEMANTICS BASED MUTATION IN GENETIC PROGRAMMING: THE CASE FOR REAL-VALUED SYMBOLIC REGRESSION
    Uy, Nguyen Quang
    Hoai, Nguyen Xuan
    O'Neill, Michael
    MENDELL 2009, 2009, : 73 - 80
  • [6] Lifetime Adaptation in Genetic Programming for the Symbolic Regression
    Merta, Jan
    Brandejsky, Tomas
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING METHODS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOL. 2, 2019, 1047 : 339 - 346
  • [7] Genetic programming with separability detection for symbolic regression
    Liu, Wei-Li
    Yang, Jiaquan
    Zhong, Jinghui
    Wang, Shibin
    COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 7 (03) : 1185 - 1194
  • [8] Genetic Programming with Rademacher Complexity for Symbolic Regression
    Raymond, Christian
    Chen, Qi
    Xue, Bing
    Zhang, Mengjie
    2019 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2019, : 2657 - 2664
  • [9] Memetic Semantic Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Leite, Alessandro
    Schoenauer, Marc
    GENETIC PROGRAMMING, EUROGP 2023, 2023, 13986 : 198 - 212
  • [10] Genetic programming with separability detection for symbolic regression
    Wei-Li Liu
    Jiaquan Yang
    Jinghui Zhong
    Shibin Wang
    Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2021, 7 : 1185 - 1194