How does emotional content affect lexical processing?

被引:124
作者
Vinson, David [1 ]
Ponari, Marta [1 ]
Vigliocco, Gabriella [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Cognit Perceptual & Brain Sci, London WC1H 0AP, England
关键词
Valence; Lexical decision; Word recognition; AUTOMATIC VIGILANCE; NEGATIVE WORDS; DECISION;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2013.851068
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Even single words in isolation can evoke emotional reactions, but the mechanisms by which emotion is involved in automatic lexical processing are unclear. Previous studies using extremely similar materials and methods have yielded apparently incompatible patterns of results. In much previous work, however, words' emotional content is entangled with other non-emotional characteristics such as frequency of occurrence, familiarity and age of acquisition, all of which have potential consequences for lexical processing themselves. In the present study, the authors compare different models of emotion using the British Lexicon Project, a large-scale freely available lexical decision database. After controlling for the potentially confounding effects of non-emotional variables, a variety of statistical approaches revealed that emotional words, whether positive or negative, are processed faster than neutral words. This effect appears to be categorical rather than graded; is not modulated by emotional arousal; and is not limited to words explicitly referring to emotions. The authors suggest that emotional connotations facilitate processing due to the grounding of words' meanings in emotional experience.
引用
收藏
页码:737 / 746
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words [J].
Altarriba, J ;
Bauer, LM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 117 (03) :389-410
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, LME4 LINEAR MIXED EF
[3]  
Baayen R. H., 2009, LANGUAGER DATASETS F
[4]   The English Lexicon Project [J].
Balota, David A. ;
Yap, Melvin J. ;
Cortese, Michael J. ;
Hutchison, Keith A. ;
Kessler, Brett ;
Loftis, Bjorn ;
Neely, James H. ;
Nelson, Douglas L. ;
Simpson, Greg B. ;
Treiman, Rebecca .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (03) :445-459
[5]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[6]  
Bradley M.M., 1999, PSYCHOLOGY
[7]  
Bradley M.M., 2000, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIEN, V25, P49, DOI DOI 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
[8]   THE MRC PSYCHOLINGUISTIC DATABASE [J].
COLTHEART, M .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 33 (NOV) :497-505
[9]   Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general [J].
Estes, Zachary ;
Adelman, James S. .
EMOTION, 2008, 8 (04) :453-457
[10]   Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: Comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006) [J].
Estes, Zachary ;
Adelman, James S. .
EMOTION, 2008, 8 (04) :441-444