ProACT™ for Stress Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy

被引:17
作者
Martens, F. M. J. [1 ]
Lampe, M. I. [1 ]
Heesakkers, J. P. F. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Operative therapy; Adjustable continence therapy; Radical prostatectomy; Stress urinary incontinence; ADJUSTABLE CONTINENCE THERAPY; SINGLE-CENTER; SPHINCTER; IMPLANTATION;
D O I
10.1159/000218526
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Stress urinary incontinence is a bothersome complication of radical prostatectomy. Surgical treatment consists of the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), the male sling and bulk injections. This study presents the results of the first series of implantations of ProACT(TM) in the Netherlands. Materials and Methods: A non-validated questionnaire was sent to 29 male patients implanted with ProACT to determine Stamey score, pad count and questions about quality of life and satisfaction. Complications, revisions and explantations were registered. Results: Mean follow-up was 41 months. Based on Stamey score four patients are continent at the end and nine patients according to the pad count. The average pad count decreased significantly. Remarkable was the high rate of dislocations and revisions and patients' satisfaction. Conclusions: ProACT is a less invasive treatment compared to the AUS. However, the procedure is associated with a substantial revision and explantation rate. ProACT can be part of a so-called step-up approach before opting for a more invasive treatment. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 398
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: Mean followup of 18 months [J].
Castle, EP ;
Andrews, PE ;
Itano, N ;
Novicki, DE ;
Swanson, SK ;
Ferrigni, RG .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (05) :1657-1660
[2]   Revision rate after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for incontinence after radical prostatectomy: Actuarial analysis [J].
Clemens, JQ ;
Schuster, TG ;
Konnak, JW ;
McGuire, EJ ;
Faerber, GJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (04) :1372-1375
[3]   The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: A prospective study [J].
Comiter, CV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (02) :597-601
[4]   A national survey of urinary and health related quality of life outcomes in men with an artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence [J].
Dalkin, BL ;
Wessells, H ;
Cui, HY .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (01) :237-239
[5]   Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: A review of 323 cases [J].
Elliott, DS ;
Barrett, DM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (04) :1206-1208
[6]   The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings [J].
Ficazzola, MA ;
Nitti, VW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (04) :1317-1320
[7]   The male perineal sling: Assessment and prediction of outcome [J].
Fischer, Melissa C. ;
Huckabay, Chad ;
Nitti, Victor W. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04) :1414-1418
[8]  
Gitlin J., 2001, COMPLICATIONS UROLOG, V3, P437
[9]  
Gregori A, 2006, J UROLOGY, V176, P2109, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.041
[10]   RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY - MORBIDITY AND URINARY CONTINENCE IN 418 CONSECUTIVE CASES [J].
HAUTMANN, RE ;
SAUTER, TW ;
WENDEROTH, UK .
UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (02) :47-51