Impact of ureteral stenting in ureteroscopy

被引:27
作者
Chew, Ben H. [1 ]
Seitz, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Urol Sci, Level 6 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, FEBU, Vienna, Austria
关键词
biomaterials; stent; ureteral stent; ureteroscopy; urolithiasis; ALPHA-BLOCKERS; ACCESS SHEATH; INFECTIONS; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1097/MOU.0000000000000234
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of review We review new therapies and biomaterials designed to reduce ureteral stent symptoms in patients undergoing ureteroscopy. Recent findings Pharmacologically, alpha blockers and antimuscarinics have been shown to have a synergistic effect and be more effective than either medication alone in reducing stent-related symptoms. Prestenting patients prior to ureterosocpy has been shown to be beneficial for patients with renal stones, offering a better stone-free rate and reduced complications, but not for ureteral stones. Stenting after use of a ureteral access sheath reduced complications and unscheduled emergency visits. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories have been shown to prevent pain after stent removal. Surveys showed that patients preferred to remove their own stents via dangle strings at home or undergo cystoscopic removal in the operating room with some type of anesthesia. New materials such as gel-based or biodegradable ureteral stents are being developed to deal with stent-related pain, encrustation, and infection. Antirefluxing stents eliminate vesicoureteric reflux in patients during voiding and may reduce symptoms of back and flank pain. Ureteral stents are involved in many procedures in urology and particularly kidney stone treatments. Summary Advances in materials and medications will help improve the patient experience for those who receive a ureteral stent.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 80
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Assimos D, 2015, BJU INT
  • [2] Do ureteric stent extraction strings affect stent-related quality of life or complications after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis: a prospective randomised control trial
    Barnes, Kerri T.
    Bing, Megan T.
    Tracy, Chad R.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 (04) : 605 - 609
  • [3] The difficult ureter: what is the incidence of pre-stenting?
    Cetti, R. J.
    Biers, S.
    Keoghane, S. R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2011, 93 (01) : 31 - 33
  • [4] In Vivo Evaluation of the Third Generation Biodegradable Stent: A Novel Approach to Avoiding the Forgotten Stent Syndrome
    Chew, Ben H.
    Paterson, Ryan F.
    Clinkscales, Kenneth W.
    Levine, Barry S.
    Shalaby, Shalaby W.
    Lange, Dirk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (02) : 719 - 725
  • [5] Biofilms and their role in infections in urology
    Choong, S
    Whitfield, H
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 86 (08) : 935 - 941
  • [6] Dauw CA, 2015, J ENDOUROL
  • [7] The beneficial effect of alpha-blockers for ureteral stent-related discomfort: systematic review and network meta-analysis for alfuzosin versus tamsulosin versus placebo
    Kwon, Jong Kyou
    Cho, Kang Su
    Oh, Cheol Kyu
    Kang, Dong Hyuk
    Lee, Hyungmin
    Ham, Won Sik
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Lee, Joo Yong
    [J]. BMC UROLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [8] Ureteral stent-associated complications-where we are and where we are going
    Lange, Dirk
    Bidnur, Samir
    Hoag, Nathan
    Chew, Ben H.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2015, 12 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [9] Uropathogen Interaction With the Surface of Urological Stents Using Different Surface Properties
    Lange, Dirk
    Elwood, Chelsea N.
    Choi, Kenny
    Hendlin, Kari
    Monga, Manoj
    Chew, Ben H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (03) : 1194 - 1200
  • [10] Liu S, 2015, UROLITHIASIS