The Biology and Evolution of Cohesive Gel and Shaped Implants

被引:46
作者
Calobrace, M. Bradley [1 ]
Capizzi, Peter J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Calobrace Plast Surg Ctr, Louisville, KY 40222 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Charlotte, NC USA
[3] Stillwater Plast Surg, Charlotte, NC USA
关键词
FILLED BREAST IMPLANT; FORM STABILITY; SAFETY; CORE;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000000347
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The introduction of the silicone gel implant in 1962 began the modern era of breast augmentation, and over the past 50 years, breast implants have evolved to encompass a wide array of commercially available implants today. In April 1992, the moratorium on silicone gel breast implants began, and much of the experience and development of the cohesive shaped implants occurred outside the United States. During this time, saline implants were used almost exclusively in North America, whereas silicone implants continued to be used throughout the rest of the world. In 2001, cohesive gel implants became available in the United States under an Investigational Device Exemption Study. Three companies have US Food and Drug Administration approval of fifth-generation implants: Sientra, Allergan, and Mentor. These implants are unique due to the texture of the shell, implant dimensions, gel-shell interaction, gel fill ratio, degree of cross-linking, and form stability. Although form stability is a relative term, it may best be reserved to describe the increased ability of the implant to maintain its basic, intended shape. The cross-linking, form stability, and cohesiveness of these fifth-generation implants provide surgeons with an innovative tool to more closely create a natural breast in both shape and softness.
引用
收藏
页码:6S / 11S
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Adams WP, 2007, INNOVATIONS PLASTIC, V1, P7
  • [2] Adams WP, 2006, SURG BREAST PRINCIPL, V1, P424
  • [3] Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years
    Bengtson, Bradley P.
    Van Natta, Bruce W.
    Murphy, Diane K.
    Slicton, Araceli
    Maxwell, G. Patrick
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 120 (07) : 40S - 48S
  • [4] Brook MA, 2012, WOODH PUBL SER BIOM, V42, P52
  • [5] Brown MH, 2005, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V116, P768, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000176259.66948.e7
  • [6] Cronin TD, 1963, T 3 INT C PLAST SURG
  • [7] Saline-filled breast implant safety and efficacy: A multicenter retrospective review
    Cunningham, BL
    Lokeh, A
    Gutowski, KA
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 105 (06) : 2143 - 2149
  • [8] Cunningham BL, 2007, INNOVATIONS PLASTIC, V1, P1
  • [9] Mentor Contour Profile Gel Implants: Clinical Outcomes at 6 Years
    Hammond, Dennis C.
    Migliori, Mark M.
    Caplin, David A.
    Garcia, M. Emily
    Phillips, Christine A.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (06) : 1381 - 1391
  • [10] Discussion: Form Stability of the Style 410 Anatomically Shaped Cohesive Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implant in Subglandular Breast Augmentation Evaluated with Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Hammond, Dennis C.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 127 (01) : 414 - 416