Re-evaluating how to measure jurors' comprehension and application of jury instructions

被引:13
作者
Baguley, Chantelle M. [1 ]
McKimmie, Blake M. [1 ]
Masser, Barbara M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Jury instructions; judicial directions; comprehension; application; verdict accuracy; measurement; TRIAL COMPLEXITY; PENALTY PHASE; LEGAL; SIMPLIFICATION; NULLIFICATION; VERDICTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/1068316X.2019.1634195
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In order for jurors to decide a legally correct verdict, they must comprehend and apply jury instructions. To date, empirical research has focused on jurors' comprehension of instructions. However, it is difficult to know how well jurors actually comprehend instructions, because the tests currently used by researchers to measure jurors' comprehension provide different estimates of jurors' comprehension. It is also difficult to know the degree to which jurors apply instructions, because researchers have not directly examined this question. This article reviews the current tests used to measure jurors' comprehension of instructions, and the current methods used to make inferences about jurors' application of instructions. It then critically analyses these approaches, and recommends ways to improve these approaches in future research, to enable researchers to draw more precise conclusions about the quality of jurors' decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 66
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[51]   Reducing Racial Bias in the Penalty Phase of Capital Trials [J].
Shaked-Schroer, Netta ;
Costanzo, Mark ;
Marcus-Newhall, Amy .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2008, 26 (05) :603-617
[52]   Getting to the Point: Attempting to Improve Juror Comprehension of Capital Penalty Phase Instructions [J].
Smith, Amy E. ;
Haney, Craig .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 35 (05) :339-350
[53]   PROTOTYPES IN THE COURTROOM - LAY REPRESENTATIONS OF LEGAL CONCEPTS [J].
SMITH, VL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (06) :857-872
[54]  
SPIVAK B, 2018, PSYCHIAT PSYCHOL LAW
[55]   The impact on juror verdicts of judicial instruction to disregard inadmissible evidence: A meta-analysis [J].
Steblay, Nancy ;
Hosch, Harmon M. ;
Culhane, Scott E. ;
McWethy, Adam .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2006, 30 (04) :469-492
[56]  
Steele W.W., 1988, N CAROLINA LAW REV, V67, P77
[57]  
STRAWN DU, 1976, JUDICATURE, V59, P478
[58]   IRONIC PROCESSES OF MENTAL CONTROL [J].
WEGNER, DM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1994, 101 (01) :34-52
[59]   When the antidote is the poison: Ironic mental control processes [J].
Wegner, DM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1997, 8 (03) :148-150
[60]   Guided jury discretion in capital murder cases - The role of declarative and procedural knowledge [J].
Wiener, RL ;
Rogers, M ;
Winter, R ;
Hurt, L ;
Hackney, A ;
Kadela, K ;
Seib, H ;
Rauch, S ;
Warren, L ;
Morasco, B .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2004, 10 (04) :516-576