Re-evaluating how to measure jurors' comprehension and application of jury instructions

被引:13
作者
Baguley, Chantelle M. [1 ]
McKimmie, Blake M. [1 ]
Masser, Barbara M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Jury instructions; judicial directions; comprehension; application; verdict accuracy; measurement; TRIAL COMPLEXITY; PENALTY PHASE; LEGAL; SIMPLIFICATION; NULLIFICATION; VERDICTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/1068316X.2019.1634195
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In order for jurors to decide a legally correct verdict, they must comprehend and apply jury instructions. To date, empirical research has focused on jurors' comprehension of instructions. However, it is difficult to know how well jurors actually comprehend instructions, because the tests currently used by researchers to measure jurors' comprehension provide different estimates of jurors' comprehension. It is also difficult to know the degree to which jurors apply instructions, because researchers have not directly examined this question. This article reviews the current tests used to measure jurors' comprehension of instructions, and the current methods used to make inferences about jurors' application of instructions. It then critically analyses these approaches, and recommends ways to improve these approaches in future research, to enable researchers to draw more precise conclusions about the quality of jurors' decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 66
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   MEMORY FOR A LECTURE - EFFECTS OF NOTES, LECTURE RATE, AND INFORMATIONAL DENSITY [J].
AIKEN, EG ;
THOMAS, GS ;
SHENNUM, WA .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 67 (03) :439-444
[2]  
[Anonymous], J JUDICIAL ADM
[3]   Deconstructing the Simplification of Jury Instructions: How Simplifying the Features of Complexity Affects Jurors' Application of Instructions [J].
Baguley, Chantelle M. ;
McKimmie, Blake M. ;
Masser, Barbara M. .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 41 (03) :284-304
[4]   The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? [J].
Bornstein, BH .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1999, 23 (01) :75-91
[5]  
Brehm J. W., 1966, A Theory of Psychological Reactance
[6]   Improving comprehension of jury instructions with audio-visual presentation [J].
Brewer, N ;
Harvey, S ;
Semmler, C .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 18 (06) :765-776
[7]   Factors Affecting the Length of Time a Jury Deliberates: Case Characteristics and Jury Composition [J].
Brunell, Thomas L. ;
Dave, Chetan ;
Morgan, Nicholas C. .
REVIEW OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2009, 5 (01) :555-578
[9]  
Chaiken S., 2012, Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, V1, P246, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446249215.N13
[10]   MAKING LEGAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDABLE - PSYCHOLINGUISTIC STUDY OF JURY INSTRUCTIONS [J].
CHARROW, RP ;
CHARROW, VR .
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1979, 79 (07) :1306-1374