Investment Law before Arbitration

被引:9
作者
Hepburn, Jarrod [1 ]
Paparinskis, Martins [2 ]
Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard [3 ]
Waibel, Michael [4 ]
机构
[1] Melbourne Law Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] UCL, Publ Int Law, London, England
[3] UCL, Int Polit Econ, London, England
[4] Univ Vienna, Int Law, Vienna, Austria
关键词
TREATIES; COMPENSATION; REFORM;
D O I
10.1093/jiel/jgaa037
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Investment law was not always about investor-state arbitration. Based on British and German archival materials from the Cold War, this paper shows how aims and priorities in the investment treaty regime changed over time. We find important differences in the role and relative importance of different legal rules then and now. Most notably, national treatment and free transfer clauses were key in early investment law, whereas fair and equitable treatment was regarded as relatively unimportant. At the same time, early drafters did anticipate some of the most contentious issues in modern investment law, including treaty shopping, shareholder protection, and the 'no greater rights' proviso.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 947
页数:19
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Abdelal Rawi., 2007, Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance
[2]  
Aisbett Emma, 2020, WORKING PAPER
[3]  
Alschner W., 2017, YALE J INT L, V42, P1
[4]   The Justification of Privilege in International Investment Law: Preferential Treatment of Foreign Investors as a Problem of Legitimacy [J].
Alvik, Ivar .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2020, 31 (01) :289-312
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, L.A. Times
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, J WORLD INVESTMENT T, V21
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Financial Times
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ICSID Review
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2013, WORLD INV POL RISK
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2000, NEWS FROM ICSID, V17, P7