RESPONSE OF RAINFED CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) TO TWEEN ROW SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT AT MULTIPLE DENSITIES

被引:0
|
作者
Erdogan, Cahit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mustafa Kemal, Dept Field Crops, Fac Agr, Antakya, Turkey
来源
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES | 2014年 / 51卷 / 01期
关键词
Chickpea; seed yield; leaf area index; light interception; planting pattern; RADIATION INTERCEPTION; LIGHT INTERCEPTION; CANOPY DEVELOPMENT; PLANT DENSITIES; USE EFFICIENCY; GRAIN LEGUMES; GROWTH; YIELD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Plant density and arrangement are important factors affecting rainfed chickpea yield. A field experiment was conducted under the Eastern Mediterranean conditions for two consecutive growing seasons (2009-2010 and 2010-2011) to evaluate the effects of plant density (20, 25, 35 and 55 plants per m(2)) and spatial configuration (conventional single 36-cm row width vs 18-cm twin rows spaced 72-cm between paired-rows). The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design in a factorial arrangement with three replications. Light interception (LI) and leaf area index (LAI) were significantly affected by plant density. Twin-row arrangement had higher light interception efficiency (LIE) than the single-row. Plants grown in the higher plant densities had greater LAI and LI; however, they had inefficient use of incident solar radiation. The number of primary branches was significantly affected by both planting patterns and plant densities, but the number of secondary branches was significantly affected only by the plant densities. The number of pods and seeds/plant decreased with the increasing plant density. The highest seed weight/plant was recorded at the lowest density (20 plants/m(2)) while the lowest one was recorded at the highest plant density (55 plants/m(2)). Seed weight and harvest index in the twin row were significantly higher in tween row than in the single row.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of response to drought stress of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) lines under rainfed conditions
    Toker, Cengiz
    Cagirgan, M. Ilhan
    Turk Tarim ve Ormancilik Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry, 22 (06): : 615 - 621
  • [2] The effects of different planting densities on seed yield and quantitative traits of rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties
    Shamsi, Keyvan
    Kobraee, Soheil
    Rasekhi, Behrooz
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2011, 6 (03): : 655 - 659
  • [3] Path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under rainfed conditions
    Arshad, M
    Bakhsh, A
    Ghafoor, A
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2004, 36 (01) : 75 - 81
  • [4] Response of sulphur on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under rainfed condition
    Mishra, Uma Shankar
    Sirothia, Pawan
    Mishra, D. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND STATISTICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 4 (01): : 177 - 180
  • [5] Field response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to high temperature
    Devasirvatham, V.
    Gaur, P. M.
    Raju, T. N.
    Trethowan, R. M.
    Tan, D. K. Y.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2015, 172 : 59 - 71
  • [6] Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to zinc and molybdenum fertilization
    Bozoglu, Hatice
    Ozcelik, Huseyin
    Mut, Zeki
    Pesken, Erkut
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2007, 36 (02): : 145 - 149
  • [7] CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) STARCH CHARACTERIZATION
    De Oliveira, Talita Moreira
    Pirozi, Monica Ribeiro
    Da Silva Borges, Joao Tomaz
    Germani, Rogerio
    Ferreira Fontes, Mauricio Paulo
    BOLETIM DO CENTRO DE PESQUISA DE PROCESSAMENTO DE ALIMENTOS, 2009, 27 (01): : 27 - 42
  • [8] Clustering of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) accessions
    Jomová, K
    Benková, M
    Záková, M
    Gregová, E
    Kraic, J
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2005, 52 (08) : 1039 - 1048
  • [9] Selection criteria in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Toker, C
    Cagirgan, MI
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2003, 53 (01): : 42 - 45
  • [10] Clustering of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Accessions
    Klaudia Jomová
    Michaela Benková
    Mária Žáková
    Edita Gregová
    Ján Kraic
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2005, 52 : 1039 - 1048