Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect

被引:205
作者
Nuerk, HC
Iversen, W
Willmes, K
机构
[1] Univ Hosp RWTH Aachen, Sect Neuropsychol, D-52057 Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany
来源
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY | 2004年 / 57卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02724980343000512
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Number magnitude and number parity representation are fundamental number representations. However, the representation of parity is much less understood than that of magnitude: Therefore, we investigated it by examining the (new) Linguistic Markedness of Response Codes (MARC) effect: Responses are facilitated if stimuli and response codes both have the same (congruent) linguistic markedness (even-right, odd-left) while incongruent conditions (even-left, odd-right) lead to interference. We examined systematically the MARC (for parity) and the Spatial Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC; for magnitude) effect for different number notations (positive Arabic, negative Arabic, number words) and with different methods of data analysis. In a parity judgement task, the SNARCeffect indicating a magnitude representation was replicated for all notations except for negative numerals. The MARCeffect was found for number words in all analyses, but less consistently for the other notations. In contrast, a correlational analysis of the reaction time (RT) data, as suggested by Sternberg (1969) using a nonmetric multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) procedure, produced a clear association of parity and response code for all notations (MARCeffect), but little evidence of the SNARCeffect. We discuss the extent to which these notation-specific MARC and SNARC effects constrain current models of number processing and elaborate on the possible functional locus of the MARC effect.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 863
页数:29
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1973, The Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series
[2]  
[Anonymous], NATURE ORIGINS MATH
[3]   WHAT SOME CONCEPTS MIGHT NOT BE [J].
ARMSTRONG, SL ;
GLEITMAN, LR ;
GLEITMAN, H .
COGNITION, 1983, 13 (03) :263-308
[4]   COGNITIVE ARITHMETIC - A REVIEW OF DATA AND THEORY [J].
ASHCRAFT, MH .
COGNITION, 1992, 44 (1-2) :75-106
[5]   Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space [J].
Bächtold, D ;
Baumüller, M ;
Brugger, P .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1998, 36 (08) :731-735
[6]   Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation [J].
Berch, DB ;
Foley, EJ ;
Hill, RJ ;
Ryan, PM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 74 (04) :286-308
[7]  
BERINGER J, 1993, HDB ERTS EXPT RUN TI
[8]  
Borg I., 1987, Multidimensional Similarity Structure Analysis
[9]   ARABIC NUMBER READING - ON THE NATURE OF THE NUMERICAL SCALE AND THE ORIGIN OF PHONOLOGICAL RECODING [J].
BRYSBAERT, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1995, 124 (04) :434-452
[10]   COMPARISONS OF DIGITS AND DOT PATTERNS [J].
BUCKLEY, PB ;
GILLMAN, CB .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 103 (06) :1131-1136