Rhesus macaques use probabilities to predict future events

被引:18
作者
De Petrillo, Francesca [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Rosati, Alexandra G. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, 530 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Inst Adv Study Toulouse, Manufaucture Tabacs, 21 Allee Brienne, F-31015 Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Anthropol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] CNR, Ist Sci & Tecnol Cogniz, Rome, Italy
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Intuitive statistics; Probabilistic reasoning; Logical inferences; Non-human primates; RISK PREFERENCES; DECISION-MAKING; MACACA-MULATTA; YOUNG-CHILDREN; MONKEYS; OTHERS; INFERENCE; CHIMPANZEES; COGNITION; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.05.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Humans can use an intuitive sense of statistics to make predictions about uncertain future events, a cognitive skill that underpins logical and mathematical reasoning. Recent research shows that some of these abilities for statistical inferences can emerge in preverbal infants and non-human primates such as apes and capuchins. An important question is therefore whether animals share the full complement of intuitive reasoning abilities demonstrated by humans, as well as what evolutionary contexts promote the emergence of such skills. Here, we examined whether free-ranging rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) can use probability information to infer the most likely outcome of a random lottery, in the first test of whether primates can make such inferences in the absence of direct prior experience. We developed a novel expectancy-violation looking time task, adapted from prior studies of infants, in order to assess the monkeys' expectations. In Study 1, we confirmed that monkeys (n = 20) looked similarly at different sampled items if they had no prior knowledge about the population they were drawn from. In Study 2, monkeys (n = 80) saw a dynamic 'lottery' machine containing a mix of two types of fruit outcomes, and then saw either the more common fruit (expected trial) or the relatively rare fruit (unexpected trial) fall from the machine. We found that monkeys looked longer when they witnessed the unexpected outcome. In Study 3, we confirmed that this effect depended on the causal relationship between the sample and the population, not visual mismatch: monkeys (n = 80) looked equally at both outcomes if the experimenter pulled the sampled item from her pocket. These results reveal that rhesus monkeys spontaneously use information about probability to reason about likely outcomes, and show how comparative studies of nonhumans can disentangle the evolutionary history of logical reasoning capacities.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 446
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [51] Spontaneous Metacognition in Rhesus Monkeys
    Rosati, Alexandra G.
    Santos, Laurie R.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 27 (09) : 1181 - 1191
  • [52] Rhesus monkeys show human-like changes in gaze following across the lifespan
    Rosati, Alexandra G.
    Arre, Alyssa M.
    Platt, Michael L.
    Santos, Laurie R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 283 (1830)
  • [53] Chimpanzees and Bonobos Exhibit Emotional Responses to Decision Outcomes
    Rosati, Alexandra G.
    Hare, Brian
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (05):
  • [54] Decision making across social contexts: competition increases preferences for risk in chimpanzees and bonobos
    Rosati, Alexandra G.
    Hare, Brian
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2012, 84 (04) : 869 - 879
  • [55] Vertebrate predation and food-sharing in Cebus and Pan
    Rose, LM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 1997, 18 (05) : 727 - 765
  • [56] Rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta, know what others can and cannot hear
    Santos, Laurie R.
    Nissen, Aaron G.
    Ferrugia, Jonathan A.
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2006, 71 : 1175 - 1181
  • [57] The Evolutionary Roots of Human Decision Making
    Santos, Laurie R.
    Rosati, Alexandra G.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 66, 2015, 66 : 321 - 347
  • [58] Modularity, comparative cognition and human uniqueness
    Shettleworth, Sara J.
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 367 (1603) : 2794 - 2802
  • [59] Another Look at Looking Time: Surprise as Rational Statistical Inference
    Sim, Zi L.
    Xu, Fei
    [J]. TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (01) : 154 - 163
  • [60] Core knowledge
    Spelke, Elizabeth S.
    Kinzler, Katherine D.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2007, 10 (01) : 89 - 96