Digital humanities methods as a gateway to inter and transdisciplinarity

被引:1
作者
Cosgrave, Mike [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Cork, Cork, Ireland
关键词
Digital methods; interdisciplinarity; transdisciplinarity; pedagogy; epistemology; research based learning;
D O I
10.1080/23801883.2019.1657639
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
Advances in digital methods not only allow the application of quantitative methods to new problems but also offer new possibilities for collaborative qualitative research. This permits us to look again at the 'two cultures' of scientific and humanities research as an interdisciplinary continuum of methods rather than as opposites. DInformed by teaching digital research methods courses in history, politics, international relations and digital humanities at undergraduate and graduate level over the past 30 years, this paper draws on Unsworth's idea of 'Scholarly primitives' sand the ideas of Willard McCarthy to suggests that a range of methods provide the basic ingredients on which a variety of disciplinary perspectives are built. Thus an integrated perspective can flow from tools and methods upwards to epistemology and ontology in research-based learning. This allows us to equip our students to use a range of common research tools which may be applied across disciplines, while at the same time making them more aware of higher order differences in disciplinary perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 33
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Allen Graham., 2000, Intertextuality, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203829455
  • [2] Methodological commons: arts and humanities e-Science fundamentals
    Anderson, Sheila
    Blanke, Tobias
    Dunn, Stuart
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2010, 368 (1925): : 3779 - 3796
  • [3] Harris Kenneth., 1967, Conversations
  • [4] Irani Zahir, 2018, The Guardian
  • [5] Krishnan A., 2009, What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarily vs. interdisciplinary Debate
  • [6] McCarty William, 2002, Mapping the field
  • [7] Moran Joe., 2010, Interdisciplinarity: The Critical Idiom
  • [8] Pierce R., 2008, RES METHODS POLITICS
  • [9] Schon D., 1995, CHANGE MAGAZINE HIGH, V27, P27, DOI [10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673, DOI 10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673]
  • [10] Siemens R, 2016, DIGITAL STUDIES CHAM, V5, DOI [10.16995/dscn.31, DOI 10.16995/DSCN.31]