Review of methodological challenges in comparing the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States

被引:6
作者
Cole, Ashley L. [1 ]
Austin, Anna E. [2 ]
Hickson, Ryan P. [1 ]
Dixon, Matthew S. [1 ]
Barber, Emma L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, UNC Eshelman Sch Pharm, Div Pharmaceut Outcomes & Policy, Campus Box 7573, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Neoadjuvant therapy; Ovarian neoplasms; Comparative effectiveness research; Observational study; Epidemiology; Review; Cytoreduction surgical procedures; ADVANCED-STAGE OVARIAN; LAPAROSCOPIC-BASED SCORE; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY; CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; SURGICAL CYTOREDUCTION; EVALUATE RESECTABILITY; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; INTERVAL DEBULKING; IMPROVED SURVIVAL; ELDERLY-WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.canep.2018.05.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Randomized trials outside the U.S. have found non-inferior survival for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). However, these trials reported lower overall survival and lower rates of optimal debulking than U.S. studies, leading to questions about generalizability to U.S. practice, where aggressive debulking is more common. Consequently, comparative effectiveness in the U.S. remains controversial. We reviewed U.S. comparative effectiveness studies of NACT versus PDS for AOC. Here we describe methodological challenges, compare results to trials outside the U.S., and make suggestions for future research. We identified U.S. studies published in 2010 or later that evaluated the comparative effectiveness of NACT versus PDS on survival in AOC through a PubMed search. Two independent reviewers abstracted data from eligible articles. Nine of 230 articles were eligible for review. Methodological challenges included unmeasured confounders, heterogeneous treatment effects, treatment variations over time, and inconsistent measurement of treatment and survival. Whereas some limitations were unavoidable, several limitations noted across studies were avoidable, including conditioning on mediating factors and immortal time introduced by measuring survival beginning from diagnosis. Without trials in the U.S., non-randomized studies are an important source of evidence for the ideal treatment for AOC. However, several methodological challenges exist when assessing the comparative effectiveness of NACT versus PDS in a non-randomized setting. Future observational studies must ensure that treatment is consistent throughout the study period and that treatment groups are comparable. Rapidly-evolving oncology data networks may allow for identification of treatment intent and other important confounders.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 16
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Aggressive surgical effort and improved survival in advanced-stage ovarian cancer
    Aletti, GD
    Dowdy, SC
    Gostout, BS
    Jones, MB
    Stanhope, CR
    Wilson, TO
    Podratz, KC
    Cliby, WA
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (01) : 77 - 85
  • [2] Relationship among surgical complexity, short-term morbidity, and overall survival in primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
    Aletti, Giovanni D.
    Dowdy, Sean C.
    Podratz, Karl C.
    Cliby, William A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : 676.e1 - 676.e7
  • [3] Quality Improvement in the Surgical Approach to Advanced Ovarian Cancer: The Mayo Clinic Experience
    Aletti, Giovanni D.
    Dowdy, Sean C.
    Gostout, Bobbie S.
    Jones, Monica B.
    Stanhope, Robert C.
    Wilson, Timothy O.
    Podratz, Karl C.
    Cliby, William A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 208 (04) : 614 - 620
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, Causal inference
  • [6] [Anonymous], AM J CLIN ONCOL
  • [7] [Anonymous], 12 BIENN M INT GYN C
  • [8] Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Update of Concepts and Management Recommendations of European LeukemiaNet
    Baccarani, Michele
    Cortes, Jorge
    Pane, Fabrizio
    Niederwieser, Dietger
    Saglio, Giuseppe
    Apperley, Jane
    Cervantes, Francisco
    Deininger, Michael
    Gratwohl, Alois
    Guilhot, Francois
    Hochhaus, Andreas
    Horowitz, Mary
    Hughes, Timothy
    Kantarjian, Hagop
    Larson, Richard
    Radich, Jerald
    Simonsson, Bengt
    Silver, Richard T.
    Goldman, John
    Hehlmann, Rudiger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (35) : 6041 - 6051
  • [9] Survival impact of surgical cytoreduction in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer
    Bristow, RE
    Montz, FJ
    Lagasse, LD
    Leuchter, RS
    Karlan, BY
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1999, 72 (03) : 278 - 287
  • [10] Bristow RE, 2000, CANCER, V89, P1532, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20001001)89:7<1532::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO