Current Trends and Advances in Image Quality Assessment

被引:15
|
作者
Okarma, Krzysztof [1 ]
机构
[1] West Pomeranian Univ Technol, Dept Signal Proc & Multimedia Engn, Fac Elect Engn, Sikorskiego 37, PL-70313 Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
关键词
Image analysis; Image quality assessment; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY; GRADIENT; INFORMATION; STATISTICS; FUSION;
D O I
10.5755/j01.eie.25.3.23681
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Image quality assessment (IQA) is one of the constantly active areas of research in computer vision. Starting from the idea of Universal Image Quality Index (UIQI), followed by well-known Structural Similarity (SSIM) and its numerous extensions and modifications, through Feature Similarity (FSIM) towards combined metrics using the multimetric fusion approach, the development of image quality assessment is still in progress. Nevertheless, regardless of new databases and the potential use of deep learning methods, some challenges remain still up to date. Some of the IQA metrics can also be used efficiently for alternative purposes, such as texture similarity estimation, quality evaluation of 3D images and 3D printed surfaces as well as video quality assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 84
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perceptual Image Quality Assessment: Recent Progress and Trends
    Lin, Weisi
    Narwaria, Manish
    VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS AND IMAGE PROCESSING 2010, 2010, 7744
  • [2] Fractal Analysis for Reduced Reference Image Quality Assessment
    Xu, Yong
    Liu, Delei
    Quan, Yuhui
    Le Callet, Patrick
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2015, 24 (07) : 2098 - 2109
  • [3] Sparse Feature Fidelity for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment
    Chang, Hua-Wen
    Yang, Hua
    Gan, Yong
    Wang, Ming-Hui
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2013, 22 (10) : 4007 - 4018
  • [4] From Sparse Coding Significance to Perceptual Quality: A New Approach for Image Quality Assessment
    Ahar, Ayyoub
    Barri, Adriaan
    Schelkens, Peter
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2018, 27 (02) : 879 - 893
  • [5] Image quality assessment with lasso regression and pairwise score differences
    Oszust, Mariusz
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2017, 76 (11) : 13255 - 13270
  • [6] Fovea Based Image Quality Assessment
    Guo, Anan
    Zhao, Debin
    Liu, Shaohui
    Cao, Guangyao
    VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS AND IMAGE PROCESSING 2010, 2010, 7744
  • [7] Biologically inspired image quality assessment
    Gao, Fei
    Yu, Jun
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2016, 124 : 210 - 219
  • [8] Comparative study of the methodologies used for subjective medical image quality assessment
    Leveque, Lucie
    Outtas, Meriem
    Liu, Hantao
    Zhang, Lu
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (15)
  • [9] Blind Image Quality Assessment Using a General Regression Neural Network
    Li, Chaofeng
    Bovik, Alan Conrad
    Wu, Xiaojun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 2011, 22 (05): : 793 - 799
  • [10] A Perceptually Weighted Rank Correlation Indicator for Objective Image Quality Assessment
    Wu, Qingbo
    Li, Hongliang
    Meng, Fanman
    Ngan, King N.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2018, 27 (05) : 2499 - 2513