The effect of vasoactive drugs on mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials

被引:50
作者
Belletti, Alessandro [1 ]
Benedetto, Umberto [2 ]
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe [3 ,4 ]
Leggieri, Carlo [1 ]
Silvani, Paolo [1 ]
Angelini, Gianni D. [2 ]
Zangrillo, Alberto [1 ,5 ]
Landoni, Giovanni [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Via Olgettina 60, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Clin Sci, Bristol Heart Inst, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Medico Surg Sci & Biotechnol, Latina, Italy
[4] IRCCS Neuromed, Dept AngioCardioNeurol, Pozzilli, Italy
[5] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
关键词
Sepsis; Vasopressors; Inotropes; Intensive care; Microcirculation; Mortality; GOAL-DIRECTED RESUSCITATION; MICROCIRCULATORY ALTERATIONS; VASOPRESSIN INFUSION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; ORGAN DYSFUNCTION; GASTRIC PERFUSION; CRITICAL ILLNESS; INTENSIVE-CARE; BLOOD-FLOW; NOREPINEPHRINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.08.010
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Inotropes and vasopressors are cornerstone of therapy in septic shock, but search for the best agent is ongoing. We aimed to determine which vasoactive drug is associated with the best survival. Materials and methods: PubMed, BioMedCentral, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register were searched. Randomized trials performed in septic patients with at least 1 group allocated to an inotrope/vasopressor were included. Network meta-analysis with a frequentist approach was performed. Results: The 33 included studies randomized 3470 patients to 16 different comparators. As compared with placebo, levosimendan (odds ratio [OR], 0.17, 95%; confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.60), dobutamine (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-0.99), epinephrine (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.96), vasopressin (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.89), and norepinephrine plus dobutamine (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.11-0.96) were significantly associated with survival. Norepinephrine improved survival compared with dopamine (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-1.00). Rank analysis showed that levosimendan had the highest probability of being the best treatment. Conclusions: Among several regimens for pharmacological cardiovascular support in septic patients, regimens based on inodilators have the highest probability of improve survival. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 98
页数:8
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Critical Care 1 Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults [J].
Adhikari, Neill K. J. ;
Fowler, Robert A. ;
Bhagwanjee, Satish ;
Rubenfeld, Gordon D. .
LANCET, 2010, 376 (9749) :1339-1346
[2]   Terlipressin or norepinephrine in hyperdynamic septic shock:: A prospective, randomized study [J].
Albanese, Jacques ;
Leone, Marc ;
Delmas, Anne ;
Martin, Claude .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (09) :1897-1902
[3]   Norepinephrine plus dobutamine versus epinephrine alone for management of septic shock:: a randomised trial [J].
Annane, Djillali ;
Vignon, Philippe ;
Renault, Alain ;
Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard ;
Charpentier, Claire ;
Martin, Claude ;
Troche, Gilles ;
Ricard, Jean-Damien ;
Nitenberg, Gerard ;
Papazian, Laurent ;
Azoulay, Elie ;
Bellissant, Eric .
LANCET, 2007, 370 (9588) :676-684
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, DOI DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602
[5]  
[Anonymous], R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[6]   Myocardial depression in sepsis: From pathogenesis to clinical manifestations and treatment [J].
Antonucci, Elio ;
Fiaccadori, Enrico ;
Donadello, Katia ;
Taccone, Fabio Silvio ;
Franchi, Federico ;
Scolletta, Sabino .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 29 (04) :500-511
[7]   The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests Cinseparate trials, is A better than C? [J].
Baker S.G. ;
Kramer B.S. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2 (1) :1-5
[8]   The Effect of inotropes and vasopressors on mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials [J].
Belletti, A. ;
Castro, M. L. ;
Silvetti, S. ;
Greco, T. ;
Biondi-Zoccai, G. ;
Pasin, L. ;
Zangrillo, A. ;
Landoni, G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 115 (05) :656-675
[9]   Non-Adrenergic Vasopressors in Patients with or at Risk for Vasodilatory Shock. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials [J].
Belletti, Alessandro ;
Musu, Mario ;
Silvetti, Simona ;
Saleh, Omar ;
Pasin, Laura ;
Monaco, Fabrizio ;
Hajjar, Ludhmila A. ;
Fominskiy, Evgeny ;
Finco, Gabriele ;
Zangrillo, Alberto ;
Landoni, Giovanni .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11)
[10]   Why we should be wary of single-center trials [J].
Bellomo, Rinaldo ;
Warrillow, Stephen J. ;
Reade, Michael C. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (12) :3114-3119