A comparison of advanced computational models and experimental techniques in predicting blast-induced ground vibration in open-pit coal mine

被引:47
作者
Hoang Nguyen [1 ]
Xuan-Nam Bui [2 ,3 ]
Moayedi, Hossein [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[2] Hanoi Univ Min & Geol, Min Fac, Dept Surface Min, Duc Thang Ward, 18 Pho Vien, Hanoi, Vietnam
[3] Hanoi Univ Min & Geol, Ctr Min, Electromech Res, Duc Thang Ward, 18 Pho Vien, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Dept Management Sci & Technol Dev, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[5] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
关键词
Support vector machine; Classification and regression tree; k-nearest neighbor; Artificial neural network; Ground vibration; Open-pit mine; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; PEAK PARTICLE-VELOCITY; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; DECISION TREE; MACHINE; PATTERN; CLASSIFICATION; INTELLIGENCE; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11600-019-00304-3
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Green mining is an essential requirement for the development of the mining industry. Of the operations in mining technology, blasting is one of the operations that significantly affect the environment, especially ground vibration. In this paper, four artificial intelligence (AI) models including artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and classification and regression tree (CART) were developed as the advanced computational models for estimating blast-induced ground vibration in a case study of Vietnam. Some empirical techniques were applied and developed to predict ground vibration and compared with the four AI models as well. For this research, 68 events of blasting were collected; 80% of the whole datasets were used to build the mentioned models, and the rest 20% were used for testing/checking the models' performances. Mean absolute error (MAE), determination coefficient (R-2), and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were used as the standards to evaluate the quality of the models in this study. The results indicated that the advanced computational models were much better than empirical techniques in estimating blast-induced ground vibration in the present study. The ANN model (2-6-8-6-1) was introduced as the most superior model for predicting ground vibration with an RMSE of 0.508, R-2 of 0.981 and MAE of 0.405 on the testing dataset. The SVM, CART, and KNN models provided poorer performance with an RMSE of 1.192, 2.820, 1.878; R-2 of 0.886, 0.618, 0.737; and MAE of 0.659, 1.631, 0.762, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1037
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   The effect of discontinuity frequency on ground vibrations produced from bench blasting: A case study [J].
Ak, Hakan ;
Konuk, Adnan .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2008, 28 (09) :686-694
[2]   Prediction of energetic performance of a building integrated photovoltaic/thermal system thorough artificial neural network and hybrid particle swarm optimization models [J].
Alnaqi, Abdulwahab A. ;
Moayedi, Hossein ;
Shahsavar, Amin ;
Truong Khang Nguyen .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 183 (137-148) :137-148
[3]  
Ambraseys N.R., 1968, ROCK MECH ENG PRACTI, P203
[4]   A new combination of artificial neural network and K-nearest neighbors models to predict blast-induced ground vibration and air-overpressure [J].
Amiri, Maryam ;
Amnieh, Hassan Bakhshandeh ;
Hasanipanah, Mahdi ;
Khanli, Leyli Mohammad .
ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2016, 32 (04) :631-644
[5]   Design of blasting pattern in proportion to the peak particle velocity (PPV): Artificial neural networks approach [J].
Amnieh, H. Bakhshandeh ;
Siamaki, A. ;
Soltani, S. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2012, 50 (09) :1913-1916
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2 INT C ADV MIN TUNN
[7]  
[Anonymous], MIN IND
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1999, P 37 ANN M ASS COMP, DOI [DOI 10.3115/1034678.1034721, 10.3115/1034678.1034721]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, APPL SCI
[10]  
[Anonymous], J PHYS C SERIES