A score system for complete cytoreduction in selected recurrent ovarian cancer patients undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery: predictors- and nomogram-based analyses

被引:24
作者
Bogani, Giorgio [1 ]
Tagliabue, Elena [1 ]
Signorelli, Mauro [1 ]
Ditto, Antonino [1 ]
Martinelli, Fabio [1 ]
Chiappa, Valentina [1 ]
Mosca, Lavinia [1 ]
Sabatucci, Ilaria [1 ]
Maggiore, Umberto Leone Roberti [1 ]
Lorusso, Domenica [1 ]
Raspagliesi, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Natl Canc Inst, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Via Venezian 1, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Ovarian Neoplasms; Recurrence; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; SURVIVAL; VALIDATION; CRITERIA; MODELS;
D O I
10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e40
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To test the applicability of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie (AGO) and Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) criteria in predicting complete cytoreduction (CC) in patients undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) for recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Methods: Data of consecutive patients undergoing SCS were reviewed. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie OVARian cancer study group (AGO-OVAR) and MSK criteria were retrospectively applied. Nomograms, based on AGO criteria, MSK criteria and both AGO and MSK criteria were built in order to assess the probability to achieve CC at SCS. Results: Overall, 194 patients met the inclusion criteria. CC was achieved in 161 (82.9%) patients. According to the AGO-OVAR criteria, we observed that CC was achieved in 87.0% of patients with positive AGO score. However, 45 out of 71 (63.4%) patients who did not fulfilled the AGO score had CC. Similarly, CC was achieved in 87.1%, 61.9% and 66.7% of patients for whom SCS was recommended, had to be considered and was not recommended, respectively. In order to evaluate the predictive value of the AGO-OVAR and MSK criteria we built 2 separate nomograms (c-index: 0.5900 and 0.5989, respectively) to test the probability to achieve CC at SCS. Additionally, we built a nomogram using both the aforementioned criteria (c-index: 0.5857). Conclusion: The AGO and MSK criteria help identifying patients deserving SCS. However, these criteria might be strict, thus prohibiting a beneficial treatment in patients who do not met these criteria. Further studies are needed to clarify factors predicting CC at SCS.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] Performance of AGO score for secondary cytoreduction in a high-volume US center
    Janco, Jo Marie Tran
    Kumar, Amanika
    Weaver, Amy L.
    McGree, Michaela E.
    Cliby, William A.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 141 (01) : 140 - 147
  • [12] Secondary Complete Cytoreduction in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Benefit of Optimal Patient Selection Using Scoring System
    Laas, Enora
    Luyckx, Mathieu
    De Cuypere, Marjolein
    Selle, Frederic
    Darai, Emile
    Querleu, Denis
    Rouzier, Roman
    Chereau, Elisabeth
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (02) : 238 - 246
  • [13] Proposal for selection criteria of secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers
    Minaguchi, Takeo
    Satoh, Toyomi
    Matsumoto, Koji
    Sakurai, Manabu
    Ochi, Hiroyuki
    Onuki, Mamiko
    Oki, Akinori
    Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 21 (03) : 573 - 579
  • [14] The role of surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer
    Pfisterer, J
    Harter, P
    Canzler, U
    Richter, B
    Jackisch, C
    Hahmann, M
    Hasenburg, A
    Burges, A
    Loibl, S
    Gropp, M
    Huober, J
    Fink, D
    Du Bois, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2005, 15 : 195 - 198
  • [15] Implementation of Extensive Cytoreduction Resulted in Improved Survival Outcomes for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced-Stage Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancers
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Ditto, Antonino
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Chiappa, Valentina
    Borghi, Chiara
    Scaffa, Cono
    Morano, Federica
    Maltese, Giuseppa
    Lorusso, Domenica
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (11) : 3396 - 3405
  • [16] Secondary cytoreductive surgery for localized, recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer - Analysis of prognostic factors and survival outcome
    Salani, Ritu
    Santillan, Antonio
    Zahurak, Marianna L.
    Giuntoli, Robert L., II
    Gardner, Ginger J.
    Armstrong, Deborah K.
    Bristow, Robert E.
    [J]. CANCER, 2007, 109 (04) : 685 - 691
  • [17] Siegel R.L., 2016, CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, V66, P7, DOI [DOI 10.3322/caac.21387, 10.3322/caac.21332]
  • [18] A Risk Model for Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: An Evidence-Based Proposal for Patient Selection
    Tian, Wen-Juan
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Sehouli, Jalid
    Trope, Claes G.
    Jiang, Rong
    Ayhan, Ali
    Cormio, Gennaro
    Xing, Yan
    Breitbach, Georg-Peter
    Braicu, Elena Ioana
    Rabbitt, Catherine A.
    Oksefjell, Halldis
    Fotopoulou, Christina
    Meerpohl, Hans-Gerd
    du Bois, Andreas
    Berek, Jonathan S.
    Zang, Rong-Yu
    Harter, Philipp
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (02) : 597 - 604
  • [19] Surgery in Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Benefits on Survival for Patients With Residual Disease of 0.1-1 cm After Secondary Cytoreduction
    Tian, Wen-Juan
    Jiang, Rong
    Cheng, Xi
    Tang, Jie
    Xing, Yan
    Zang, Rong-Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 101 (03) : 244 - 250
  • [20] Surgery for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in the Netherlands A Population-Based Cohort Study
    van de Laar, Rafli
    Kruitwagen, Roy F. P. M.
    IntHout, Joanna
    Zusterzeel, Petra L. M.
    Van Gorp, Toon
    Massuger, Leon F. A. G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 (02) : 268 - 275