A score system for complete cytoreduction in selected recurrent ovarian cancer patients undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery: predictors- and nomogram-based analyses

被引:24
作者
Bogani, Giorgio [1 ]
Tagliabue, Elena [1 ]
Signorelli, Mauro [1 ]
Ditto, Antonino [1 ]
Martinelli, Fabio [1 ]
Chiappa, Valentina [1 ]
Mosca, Lavinia [1 ]
Sabatucci, Ilaria [1 ]
Maggiore, Umberto Leone Roberti [1 ]
Lorusso, Domenica [1 ]
Raspagliesi, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Natl Canc Inst, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Via Venezian 1, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Ovarian Neoplasms; Recurrence; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; SURVIVAL; VALIDATION; CRITERIA; MODELS;
D O I
10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e40
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To test the applicability of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie (AGO) and Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) criteria in predicting complete cytoreduction (CC) in patients undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) for recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Methods: Data of consecutive patients undergoing SCS were reviewed. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie OVARian cancer study group (AGO-OVAR) and MSK criteria were retrospectively applied. Nomograms, based on AGO criteria, MSK criteria and both AGO and MSK criteria were built in order to assess the probability to achieve CC at SCS. Results: Overall, 194 patients met the inclusion criteria. CC was achieved in 161 (82.9%) patients. According to the AGO-OVAR criteria, we observed that CC was achieved in 87.0% of patients with positive AGO score. However, 45 out of 71 (63.4%) patients who did not fulfilled the AGO score had CC. Similarly, CC was achieved in 87.1%, 61.9% and 66.7% of patients for whom SCS was recommended, had to be considered and was not recommended, respectively. In order to evaluate the predictive value of the AGO-OVAR and MSK criteria we built 2 separate nomograms (c-index: 0.5900 and 0.5989, respectively) to test the probability to achieve CC at SCS. Additionally, we built a nomogram using both the aforementioned criteria (c-index: 0.5857). Conclusion: The AGO and MSK criteria help identifying patients deserving SCS. However, these criteria might be strict, thus prohibiting a beneficial treatment in patients who do not met these criteria. Further studies are needed to clarify factors predicting CC at SCS.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] A Predictive Score for Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (SeC-Score): A Single-Centre, Controlled Study for Preoperative Patient Selection
    Angioli, Roberto
    Capriglione, Stella
    Aloisi, Alessia
    Ricciardi, Roberto
    Scaletta, Giuseppe
    Lopez, Salvatore
    Miranda, Andrea
    Di Pinto, Anna
    Terranova, Corrado
    Plotti, Francesco
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (13) : 4217 - 4223
  • [2] [Anonymous], STUD COMP TUM DEB SU
  • [3] [Anonymous], CLIN OVARIAN CANC
  • [4] The Value of Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer and Application of a Prognostic Score
    Balieiro Anastacio da Costa, Alexandre Andre
    Valadares, Camila V.
    Mantoan, Henrique
    Saito, Augusto
    Salvadori, Marcella Marinelli
    Guimaraes, Andreia Paiva
    Sanches, Solange Moraes
    de Souza Wadington Achatz, Maria Isabel Alves
    Baiocchi, Glauco
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 (03) : 449 - 455
  • [5] BEREK JS, 1983, OBSTET GYNECOL, V61, P189
  • [6] Guidelines and selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma
    Chi, DS
    McCaughty, K
    Diaz, JP
    Huh, J
    Schwabenbauer, S
    Hummer, AJ
    Venkatraman, ES
    Aghajanian, C
    Sonoda, Y
    Abu-Rustum, NR
    Barakat, RR
    [J]. CANCER, 2006, 106 (09) : 1933 - 1939
  • [7] A comparative analysis of prediction models for complete gross resection in secondary cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer
    Cowan, Renee A.
    Eriksson, Ane Gerda Zahl
    Jaber, Sara M.
    Zhou, Qin
    Iasonos, Alexia
    Zivanovic, Oliver
    Leitao, Mario M., Jr.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Gardner, Ginger J.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 145 (02) : 230 - 235
  • [8] Minimal access surgery compared to laparotomy for secondary surgical cytoreduction in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma: Perioperative and oncologic outcomes
    Eriksson, Ane Gerda Z.
    Graul, Ashley
    Yu, Miao C.
    Halko, Anthony
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Zivanovic, Oliver
    Gardner, Ginger J.
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Barakat, Richard R.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Leitao, Mario M., Jr.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 146 (02) : 263 - 267
  • [9] Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer:: The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR Trial
    Harter, Philipp
    du Bois, Andreas
    Hahmann, Maik
    Hasenburg, Annette
    Burges, Alexander
    Loibl, Sibylle
    Gropp, Martina
    Huober, Jens
    Fink, Daniel
    Schroeder, Willibald
    Muenstedt, Karsten
    Schmalfeldt, Barbara
    Emons, Guenter
    Pfisterer, Jacobus
    Wollschlaeger, Kerstin
    Meerpohl, Hans-Gerd
    Breitbach, Georg-Peter
    Tanner, Berno
    Sehouli, Jalid
    AGO, O. C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (12) : 1702 - 1710
  • [10] Prospective Validation Study of a Predictive Score for Operability of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer The Multicenter Intergroup Study DESKTOP II. A Project of the AGO Kommission OVAR, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO-Austria, and MITO
    Harter, Philipp
    Sehouli, Jalid
    Reuss, Alexander
    Hasenburg, Annette
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Cibula, David
    Mahner, Sven
    Vergote, Ignace
    Reinthaller, Alexander
    Burges, Alexander
    Hanker, Lars
    Poelcher, Martin
    Kurzeder, Christian
    Canzler, Ulrich
    Petry, Karl Ulrich
    Obermair, Andreas
    Petru, Edgar
    Schmalfeldt, Barbara
    Lorusso, Domenica
    du Bois, Andreas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2011, 21 (02) : 289 - 295