Gene expression assay and Watson for Oncology for optimization of treatment in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer

被引:13
|
作者
Kim, Yun Yeong [1 ]
Oh, Se Jeong [2 ]
Chun, Yong Soon [1 ]
Lee, Woon Kee [3 ]
Park, Heung Kyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Coll Med, Gil Med Ctr, Dept Surg,Breast Canc Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ, St Marys Hosp, Breast Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Incheon, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Gil Med Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 07期
关键词
INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; RECURRENCE SCORE; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; DISTANT RECURRENCE; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; PRIMARY THERAPY; ONCOTYPE DX; TAMOXIFEN; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0200100
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Personalized treatment for cancer patients is a hot topic of debate, particularly the decision to initiate chemotherapy in patients with Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative tumors in the early stages of breast cancer (BC). Owing to significant advancements in information technology (IT) and genomics, clinicians are increasingly attaining therapeutic goals rapidly and safely by effectively differentiating patient subsets that require chemotherapy. IBM Watson for Oncology (WFO) is a cognitive computing system employed by clinicians to provide evidence-based treatment options for cancer. WFO aids in clinical diagnosis, with claims that it may be superior in performance to human clinicians. The current study was based on the hypothesis that WFO alone cannot effectively determine whether or not chemotherapy is essential for the subset of ER-positive, HER2-negative BC patients. Patients and methods From December 2015 to July 2017, 95 patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative BC subjected to treatment were retrospectively examined using WFO, and outputs compared to real clinical practice. Treatment options were suggested by WFO, and WFO recommendations calculated both with and without data from the gene expression assay (GEA). Results WFO without GEA was unable to determine the groups of patients that did not require chemotherapy. Concordant therapeutic recommendations between real clinical practice and WFO without GEA were obtained for 23.2% of the patient group. On the other hand, the results of WFO with GEA showed good clinical applicability. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values of WFO with GEA were 100%, 80%, 61% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions Our collective findings indicate that WFO without the gene expression assay has limited clinical utility.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognostic model of ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer predicted by clinically relevant indicators
    Song, Xinming
    Wang, Pintian
    Feng, Ruiling
    Chetry, Mandika
    Li, E.
    Wu, Xiaohua
    Liu, Zewa
    Liao, Shasha
    Lin, Jing
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 26 (02): : 389 - 397
  • [32] Clinical implications of molecular heterogeneity in highly proliferative, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer
    Bianchini, G.
    Pusztai, L.
    Kelly, C. M.
    Iwamoto, T.
    Callari, M.
    Symmans, W. F.
    Gianni, L.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [33] Effective sequence of endocrine therapy for ER-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
    Osako, Tomofumi
    Nishimura, Reiki
    Nishiyama, Yasuyuki
    Tashima, Rumiko
    Fujisue, Mamiko
    Nakano, Masahiro
    Toyozumi, Yasuo
    Arima, Nobuyuki
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [34] Comprehensive characterization of the HER2-enriched intrinsic molecular subtype in ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer
    Hohmann, L.
    Sigurjonsdottir, K.
    Bosch, A.
    Nacer, D. F.
    Veerla, S.
    Hakkinen, J.
    Vallon-Christersson, J.
    Borg, A.
    Memari, Y.
    Davies, H.
    Nik-Zainal, S.
    Staaf, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S310 - S311
  • [35] The numbers of Foxp3 positive cells in simultaneous bilateral ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer
    Goto, R.
    Hirota, Y.
    Aruga, T.
    Horiguchi, S.
    Tazawa, S.
    Yamashita, T.
    Kuroi, K.
    Nakamura, S.
    Takimoto, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 72 : S20 - S21
  • [36] Real world outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive/PR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer
    Kurian, Matthew
    Trybula, Marcus
    Patell, Kanchi
    Guzik, Gregory
    Margevicius, Seunghee
    Fu, Pingfu
    Montero, Alberto
    Martin, James
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (09)
  • [37] The Oncotype Dx Assay in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Real Life Experience from a Single Cancer Center
    Thibodeau, Stephane
    Voutsadakis, Ioannis A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2019, 15 (03) : 163 - 170
  • [38] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy adaptation and serial MRI response monitoring in ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer
    L S Rigter
    C E Loo
    S C Linn
    G S Sonke
    E van Werkhoven
    E H Lips
    H A Warnars
    P K Doll
    A Bruining
    I A Mandjes
    M J Vrancken Peeters
    J Wesseling
    K G Gilhuijs
    S Rodenhuis
    British Journal of Cancer, 2013, 109 : 2965 - 2972
  • [39] Real-world data on neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer
    da Silva, Leonardo Roberto
    de Andrade, Camila Annicchino
    Brenelli, Fabricio
    Ramalho, Susana
    Reinert, Tomas
    de Souza, Alessandra Borba Anton
    da Silva, Ana Elisa Ribeiro
    de Paula Leite Kraft, Maria Beatriz
    de Vasconcelos, Vivian Castro Antunes
    Frasson, Antonio Luiz
    Torresan, Renato Zochio
    Cabello, Cesar
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    Zeferino, Luiz Carlos
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 186 (03) : 753 - 760
  • [40] Comparison of metabolic changes after neoadjuvant endocrine and chemotherapy in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer
    Ho Hyun Ryu
    Sei Hyun Ahn
    Seon Ok Kim
    Jeong Eun Kim
    Ji sun Kim
    Jin-Hee Ahn
    Kyung Hae Jung
    Sung-Bae Kim
    Beom Seok Ko
    Jong Won Lee
    Byung Ho Son
    Hee Jung Shin
    Hak Hee Kim
    Gyung yub Gong
    Hee Jeong Kim
    Scientific Reports, 11