Gene expression assay and Watson for Oncology for optimization of treatment in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer

被引:13
|
作者
Kim, Yun Yeong [1 ]
Oh, Se Jeong [2 ]
Chun, Yong Soon [1 ]
Lee, Woon Kee [3 ]
Park, Heung Kyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Coll Med, Gil Med Ctr, Dept Surg,Breast Canc Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ, St Marys Hosp, Breast Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Incheon, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Gil Med Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 07期
关键词
INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; RECURRENCE SCORE; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; DISTANT RECURRENCE; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; PRIMARY THERAPY; ONCOTYPE DX; TAMOXIFEN; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0200100
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Personalized treatment for cancer patients is a hot topic of debate, particularly the decision to initiate chemotherapy in patients with Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative tumors in the early stages of breast cancer (BC). Owing to significant advancements in information technology (IT) and genomics, clinicians are increasingly attaining therapeutic goals rapidly and safely by effectively differentiating patient subsets that require chemotherapy. IBM Watson for Oncology (WFO) is a cognitive computing system employed by clinicians to provide evidence-based treatment options for cancer. WFO aids in clinical diagnosis, with claims that it may be superior in performance to human clinicians. The current study was based on the hypothesis that WFO alone cannot effectively determine whether or not chemotherapy is essential for the subset of ER-positive, HER2-negative BC patients. Patients and methods From December 2015 to July 2017, 95 patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative BC subjected to treatment were retrospectively examined using WFO, and outputs compared to real clinical practice. Treatment options were suggested by WFO, and WFO recommendations calculated both with and without data from the gene expression assay (GEA). Results WFO without GEA was unable to determine the groups of patients that did not require chemotherapy. Concordant therapeutic recommendations between real clinical practice and WFO without GEA were obtained for 23.2% of the patient group. On the other hand, the results of WFO with GEA showed good clinical applicability. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values of WFO with GEA were 100%, 80%, 61% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions Our collective findings indicate that WFO without the gene expression assay has limited clinical utility.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reply to: Prediction of benefit from chemotherapy in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer
    Goldhirsch, A.
    Coates, A. S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (03) : 755 - 755
  • [22] Identification of key differentially expressed genes between ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer and ER-negative/HER2-negative breast cancer using integrated bioinformatics analysis
    Gan, Siyuan
    Dai, Haixia
    Li, Rujia
    Liu, Wang
    Ye, Ruifang
    Ha, Yanping
    Di, Xiaoqing
    Hu, Wenhua
    Zhang, Zhi
    Sun, Yanqin
    GLAND SURGERY, 2020, 9 (03) : 661 - 675
  • [23] Prognostic impact of PgR and Ki-67 expression in ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer patients
    Nishiyama, Yasuyuki
    Nishimura, Reiki
    Osako, Tomofumi
    Okumura, Yasuhiro
    Arima, Nobuyuki
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [24] Axillary Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Node-Positive ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
    Friedman-Eldar, Orli
    Ozmen, Tolga
    Reyes, Fernando Valle
    Goel, Neha
    Tjendra, Youley
    Kesmodel, Susane B.
    Moller, Mecker
    Franceschi, Dido
    Avisar, Eli
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (SUPPL 2) : S236 - S236
  • [26] Endo Predict predicts for the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer
    Bertucci, Francois
    Finetti, Pascal
    Viens, Patrice
    Birnbaum, Daniel
    CANCER LETTERS, 2014, 355 (01) : 70 - 75
  • [27] Prognostic model of ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer predicted by clinically relevant indicators
    Xinming Song
    Pintian Wang
    Ruiling Feng
    Mandika Chetry
    E. Li
    Xiaohua Wu
    Zewa Liu
    Shasha Liao
    Jing Lin
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2024, 26 : 389 - 397
  • [28] Development of a predictive model by gene expression profiles for pathological CR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer
    Fujiki, Y.
    Yamamoto, Y.
    Yamamoto-Ibusuki, M.
    Goto, R.
    Tomiguchi, M.
    Sueta, A.
    Takeshita, T.
    Iwase, H.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [29] Evaluating Elacestrant in the Management of ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Evidence to Date
    Varella, Leticia
    Cristofanilli, Massimo
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2023, 16 : 189 - 196
  • [30] High Mutation Burden in ER-Positive/HER2-Negative/Luminal Breast Cancers
    Voutsadakis, Ioannis A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (06)